Mind the Gap: Gender, Homophily and the Glass Ceiling in Academic Networks

This study examines the gender distribution within collaboration and mentorship networks across several scientific disciplines, namely Physics, Material Science, Computer Science, Chemistry, Biology and Psychology in the last two decades. Our analysis reveals that the proportions of women in these fields range from 24% to 49%. Despite these variations, all disciplines show evidence of gender-based homophily in their networks, and there are indications for the presence of a glass ceiling effect. Specifically, we observed that women are under-represented in high-status positions with respect to their number of mentees in mentorship networks and their scientific contributions within collaboration networks. These findings highlight longstanding gender disparities in scientific collaboration and mentoring practices, along with cumulative impacts on measured performances of researchers across disciplines. Using a network approach, this study not only extends the methodological work on quantifying gender gaps but also provides actionable insights for the design of more inclusive systems with gender-equitable access to mentorship and collaboration opportunities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
Published
2025-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3757630
Primary Topic
Gender Diversity and Inequality
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mind the Gap: Gender, Homophily and the Glass Ceiling in Academic Networks

Barbara Keller, Anh Dương Quỳnh Nguyễn, Jiaming Jiang
Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
Gender Diversity and Inequality
article

Mind the Gap: Gender, Homophily and the Glass Ceiling in Academic Networks

Barbara Keller, Anh Dương Quỳnh Nguyễn, Jiaming Jiang
article en

Abstract

This study examines the gender distribution within collaboration and mentorship networks across several scientific disciplines, namely Physics, Material Science, Computer Science, Chemistry, Biology and Psychology in the last two decades. Our analysis reveals that the proportions of women in these fields range from 24% to 49%. Despite these variations, all disciplines show evidence of gender-based homophily in their networks, and there are indications for the presence of a glass ceiling effect. Specifically, we observed that women are under-represented in high-status positions with respect to their number of mentees in mentorship networks and their scientific contributions within collaboration networks. These findings highlight longstanding gender disparities in scientific collaboration and mentoring practices, along with cumulative impacts on measured performances of researchers across disciplines. Using a network approach, this study not only extends the methodological work on quantifying gender gaps but also provides actionable insights for the design of more inclusive systems with gender-equitable access to mentorship and collaboration opportunities.

Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer InteractionVol. 9(7)
Aalto University (FI)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Gender Diversity and Inequality
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.