Incidence and severity of aortic stenosis according to machine learning predicted risk of atrial fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation (AF) and aortic stenosis (AS) are two common progressive conditions affecting older persons that share pathobiological pathways. Early detection of AS is critical for improving outcomes, but no prediction tool exists to inform decision making. In this study we evaluated the association between machine learning predicted risk of incident AF from clinical health records (using the FIND-AF algorithm) and severity and incidence of AS. In a disease registry we found that higher FIND-AF risk was correlated with parameters of increasing AS severity including smaller aortic valve area, and higher maximum velocity and peak pressure gradient but ability to differentiate severe from non-severe AS was moderate (sensitivity 0.545, specificity 0.770). In over 400,000 primary care clinical health records, FIND-AF showed good prediction performance for incident AS (AUC 0.782, 95% CI 07.69-0.795), and the cumulative incidence increased with higher FIND-AF risk strata. The hazard of AS was over 40-fold higher in patients with FIND-AF risk scores of more than 0.05 compared to patients with FIND-AF risk scores of less than 0.005. Predicted risk of AF is associated with severity and incidence of AS, but predictive ability for AS may be improved by developing a machine learning model specifically for this outcome.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-19916-5
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.39

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Incidence and severity of aortic stenosis according to machine learning predicted risk of atrial fibrillation

Harriet Larvin, Arwa Younis, Rowan Hall, Ramesh Nadarajah et al.
1 citations
Scientific Reports
Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
1.39
article

Incidence and severity of aortic stenosis according to machine learning predicted risk of atrial fibrillation

Harriet Larvin, Arwa Younis, Rowan Hall, Ramesh Nadarajah, Chris P Gale, Jianhua Wu, Daniel J. Blackman, Mohammad Haris, Dominik Schlosshan, Keerthenan Raveendra, Khalid Kazi, Tobin Joseph, Umbreen Nadeem
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Atrial fibrillation (AF) and aortic stenosis (AS) are two common progressive conditions affecting older persons that share pathobiological pathways. Early detection of AS is critical for improving outcomes, but no prediction tool exists to inform decision making. In this study we evaluated the association between machine learning predicted risk of incident AF from clinical health records (using the FIND-AF algorithm) and severity and incidence of AS. In a disease registry we found that higher FIND-AF risk was correlated with parameters of increasing AS severity including smaller aortic valve area, and higher maximum velocity and peak pressure gradient but ability to differentiate severe from non-severe AS was moderate (sensitivity 0.545, specificity 0.770). In over 400,000 primary care clinical health records, FIND-AF showed good prediction performance for incident AS (AUC 0.782, 95% CI 07.69-0.795), and the cumulative incidence increased with higher FIND-AF risk strata. The hazard of AS was over 40-fold higher in patients with FIND-AF risk scores of more than 0.05 compared to patients with FIND-AF risk scores of less than 0.005. Predicted risk of AF is associated with severity and incidence of AS, but predictive ability for AS may be improved by developing a machine learning model specifically for this outcome.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
University of Leeds (GB), Queen Mary University of London (GB), Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust (GB), Leeds Dental Hospital (GB)
British Heart Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
1.39
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.