Precision Assessment of Facial Asymmetry Using 3D Imaging and Artificial Intelligence

<b>Objectives</b>: There is a growing interest among practitioners in employing artificial intelligence (AI) to enhance the precision and efficiency of diagnostic methods. The objective of this study is to assess the precision of an AI-based method for facial asymmetry assessment using 3D facial images. <b>Methods</b>: The study included 130 patients (84 female, 46 male), analyzing 3D facial images from the Vectra<sup>®</sup> M3 imaging system using both manual and AI-based methods. Seven bilateral facial landmarks were identified for manual analysis, calculating the asymmetry index for facial symmetry assessment. An AI-based program was developed to automate the identification of the same landmarks and calculate the asymmetry index. The reliability of the manual measurements was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Precision of automated landmark identification was compared to the manual method. <b>Results</b>: The ICCs for the manual measurements demonstrated moderate to excellent reliability, both within raters (ICC = 0.62-0.99) and between raters (ICC = 0.72-0.96) each calculated with 95% CI. Agreement was observed between the manual and automated methods in calculating the asymmetry index for five landmarks. There was a statistically significant difference between the two methods in determining the asymmetry index for alare (median: 2.05 mm manual vs. 1.54 mm automated, <i>p</i> = 0.0056) and cheilion (median: 2.77 mm manual vs. 2.30 mm automated, <i>p</i> = 0.0081). <b>Conclusions</b>: The AI-based method provides efficient and comparable precision of facial asymmetry analysis using 3D images. The disagreement observed between the two methods can be addressed through further improvement and training of the automated software. This innovative approach opens doors to significant advancements in both research and clinical orthodontics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2025-10-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14207172
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Face recognition and analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.28
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Precision Assessment of Facial Asymmetry Using 3D Imaging and Artificial Intelligence

Tarek Elshebiny, Cynthia S. Beeman, James K. Hartsfield, Daniel L. Lau et al.
1 citations
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Face recognition and analysis
1.28
article

Precision Assessment of Facial Asymmetry Using 3D Imaging and Artificial Intelligence

Tarek Elshebiny, Cynthia S. Beeman, James K. Hartsfield, Daniel L. Lau, Lina Sharab, K Hunt, Hugo Reyes‐Centeno
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<b>Objectives</b>: There is a growing interest among practitioners in employing artificial intelligence (AI) to enhance the precision and efficiency of diagnostic methods. The objective of this study is to assess the precision of an AI-based method for facial asymmetry assessment using 3D facial images. <b>Methods</b>: The study included 130 patients (84 female, 46 male), analyzing 3D facial images from the Vectra<sup>®</sup> M3 imaging system using both manual and AI-based methods. Seven bilateral facial landmarks were identified for manual analysis, calculating the asymmetry index for facial symmetry assessment. An AI-based program was developed to automate the identification of the same landmarks and calculate the asymmetry index. The reliability of the manual measurements was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Precision of automated landmark identification was compared to the manual method. <b>Results</b>: The ICCs for the manual measurements demonstrated moderate to excellent reliability, both within raters (ICC = 0.62-0.99) and between raters (ICC = 0.72-0.96) each calculated with 95% CI. Agreement was observed between the manual and automated methods in calculating the asymmetry index for five landmarks. There was a statistically significant difference between the two methods in determining the asymmetry index for alare (median: 2.05 mm manual vs. 1.54 mm automated, <i>p</i> = 0.0056) and cheilion (median: 2.77 mm manual vs. 2.30 mm automated, <i>p</i> = 0.0081). <b>Conclusions</b>: The AI-based method provides efficient and comparable precision of facial asymmetry analysis using 3D images. The disagreement observed between the two methods can be addressed through further improvement and training of the automated software. This innovative approach opens doors to significant advancements in both research and clinical orthodontics.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 14(20)
Uppsala University (SE), University of Kentucky (US), Swedish Collegium for Advanced Study (SE), Overlook Medical Center (US), Gaston College (US), Case Western Reserve University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Face recognition and analysis
1.28
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.