Health risk assessment of heavy metal contamination in water sources at Michael Okpara University of Agriculture

This study evaluates the concentrations of heavy metals in water sources at Michael Okpara University of Agriculture and their associated health risks using Average Daily Intake (ADI), Hazard Index (HI), and Incremental Life Cancer Risk (ILCR) models. A total of 15 water samples were collected from five different locations within the university using acid-washed polyethylene bottles. The samples were analyzed using Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy (AAS) to determine the concentrations of arsenic (As), cadmium (Cd), cobalt (Co), chromium (Cr), nickel (Ni), and lead (Pb). The measured concentrations ranged from 0.015–0.052 mg/L for As, 0.006–0.0173 mg/L for Cd, 0.075–0.127 mg/L for Co, 0.0077–0.015 mg/L for Cr, 0.0142–0.031 mg/L for Ni, and 0.0035–0.006 mg/L for Pb. Compared to regulatory standards, As and Cd concentrations exceeded the WHO limit of 0.01 mg/L and 0.003 mg/L, respectively, in multiple locations, posing significant health concerns. The ADI results showed that As had the highest dermal exposure value (5.43E-08 mg/kg/day), while Cr exhibited the highest ingestion exposure (4.28E-09 mg/kg/day). HI values for Cr (5.22E-03) and As (4.90E-04) suggest potential non-carcinogenic health risks, particularly through dermal absorption. ILCR analysis identified As as the most carcinogenic contaminant (1.04E-07), significantly surpassing the acceptable risk threshold of 1.0E-06. Site 2 exhibited the highest heavy metal contamination levels, aligning with elevated health risk assessments. These findings emphasize the need for water treatment interventions, enhanced regulatory oversight, and community awareness to mitigate contamination risks and safeguard public health.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Communication in Physical Sciences
Published
2025-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4314/cps.v12i3.14
Primary Topic
Integrated Water Resources Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Health risk assessment of heavy metal contamination in water sources at Michael Okpara University of Agriculture

C. N. Onwubuariri, Muyiwa Michael Orosun, Kelechi Kingsley Ochommadu, Chidimma Onyinye Ikeme et al.
Communication in Physical Sciences
Integrated Water Resources Management
article

Health risk assessment of heavy metal contamination in water sources at Michael Okpara University of Agriculture

C. N. Onwubuariri, Muyiwa Michael Orosun, Kelechi Kingsley Ochommadu, Chidimma Onyinye Ikeme, Uchechi Ahunna Ezere, Chiazor Faustina Jisieike, Chisom Loveth Kelechi
article en

Abstract

This study evaluates the concentrations of heavy metals in water sources at Michael Okpara University of Agriculture and their associated health risks using Average Daily Intake (ADI), Hazard Index (HI), and Incremental Life Cancer Risk (ILCR) models. A total of 15 water samples were collected from five different locations within the university using acid-washed polyethylene bottles. The samples were analyzed using Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy (AAS) to determine the concentrations of arsenic (As), cadmium (Cd), cobalt (Co), chromium (Cr), nickel (Ni), and lead (Pb). The measured concentrations ranged from 0.015–0.052 mg/L for As, 0.006–0.0173 mg/L for Cd, 0.075–0.127 mg/L for Co, 0.0077–0.015 mg/L for Cr, 0.0142–0.031 mg/L for Ni, and 0.0035–0.006 mg/L for Pb. Compared to regulatory standards, As and Cd concentrations exceeded the WHO limit of 0.01 mg/L and 0.003 mg/L, respectively, in multiple locations, posing significant health concerns. The ADI results showed that As had the highest dermal exposure value (5.43E-08 mg/kg/day), while Cr exhibited the highest ingestion exposure (4.28E-09 mg/kg/day). HI values for Cr (5.22E-03) and As (4.90E-04) suggest potential non-carcinogenic health risks, particularly through dermal absorption. ILCR analysis identified As as the most carcinogenic contaminant (1.04E-07), significantly surpassing the acceptable risk threshold of 1.0E-06. Site 2 exhibited the highest heavy metal contamination levels, aligning with elevated health risk assessments. These findings emphasize the need for water treatment interventions, enhanced regulatory oversight, and community awareness to mitigate contamination risks and safeguard public health.

Communication in Physical SciencesVol. 12(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Integrated Water Resources Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.