Rethinking International Internships: Affective Subjectivation and Normative Friction in the Chinese Context

This conceptual article reinterprets international internships not as neutral platforms for skill development, but as structured encounters with institutional normativity and affective dissonance.Focusing on the Chinese context -a high-power, collectivist regime shaped by hierarchical discipline and guanxi networks -the study theorizes internships as liminal spaces of ethical subjectivation and intercultural identity formation.Drawing on Foucault's disciplinary power, Bourdieu's concept of habitus, boundary-crossing theory, and affect theory, it develops a normative-affective framework to analyze how foreign interns navigate disorientation, emotional labor, and embodied negotiation.Emotions such as anxiety, shame, and ambivalence are theorized as epistemic affects -forms of situated knowledge that mediate encounters with unfamiliar regimes of value, recognition, and legitimacy.Internships are thus framed not as neutral educational tools but as affective pedagogies of the self, where identity is reconstituted through ongoing engagement with institutional power and normative pressure.This framework contributes to decolonial critiques of transnational education and challenges liberal models of intercultural competence by foregrounding the emotional labor required to remain intelligible within asymmetrical systems.The analysis invites new directions in understanding how global education produces, regulates, and contests subjectivity through emotionally charged institutional encounters.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Research Result Social Studies and Humanities
Published
2025-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18413/2408-932x-2025-11-3-0-8
Primary Topic
International Student and Expatriate Challenges
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Rethinking International Internships: Affective Subjectivation and Normative Friction in the Chinese Context

L. R. Khaidarova
Research Result Social Studies and Humanities
International Student and Expatriate Challenges
article

Rethinking International Internships: Affective Subjectivation and Normative Friction in the Chinese Context

L. R. Khaidarova
article en

Abstract

This conceptual article reinterprets international internships not as neutral platforms for skill development, but as structured encounters with institutional normativity and affective dissonance.Focusing on the Chinese context -a high-power, collectivist regime shaped by hierarchical discipline and guanxi networks -the study theorizes internships as liminal spaces of ethical subjectivation and intercultural identity formation.Drawing on Foucault's disciplinary power, Bourdieu's concept of habitus, boundary-crossing theory, and affect theory, it develops a normative-affective framework to analyze how foreign interns navigate disorientation, emotional labor, and embodied negotiation.Emotions such as anxiety, shame, and ambivalence are theorized as epistemic affects -forms of situated knowledge that mediate encounters with unfamiliar regimes of value, recognition, and legitimacy.Internships are thus framed not as neutral educational tools but as affective pedagogies of the self, where identity is reconstituted through ongoing engagement with institutional power and normative pressure.This framework contributes to decolonial critiques of transnational education and challenges liberal models of intercultural competence by foregrounding the emotional labor required to remain intelligible within asymmetrical systems.The analysis invites new directions in understanding how global education produces, regulates, and contests subjectivity through emotionally charged institutional encounters.

Research Result Social Studies and HumanitiesVol. 11(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
International Student and Expatriate Challenges
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.