Nazianzen <i>Contra Sophistas. </i>Notes on the Genre and Structure of <i>Oration 27</i>

This article reevaluates the genre and structure of the “First Theological Oration” (or. 27) of Gregory of Nazianzus. At stake in understanding these aspects of the speech is our sense of its actual tone and tenor, and consequently its place in the rhetorical “program” of Gregory’s Constantinopolitan orations. Because it is not written as an “invective” (ψόγος), as is often claimed, or. 27 may admit of a more dialogic reading than previous interpreters have allowed. By attending more closely to Gregory’s use of traditional language, the role of his syntax in disclosing the structure of the speech, and the ways in which traditional editorial conventions have sometimes obscured this structure, this article recasts or. 27 as chiefly an exercise in protreptic (προτροπή). Moreover, it suggests that or. 27 is evidence that a spirit of dialogue, and not of contempt, is likely to have typified Gregory’s rhetorical stance toward his opponents in Constantinople, prior to the autumn of 380.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Sacris Erudiri
Published
2024-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1484/j.se.5.150131
Primary Topic
Classical Antiquity Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Nazianzen Contra Sophistas. Notes on the Genre and Structure of Oration 27

B. Hirsch
Sacris Erudiri
Classical Antiquity Studies
article

Nazianzen Contra Sophistas. Notes on the Genre and Structure of Oration 27

B. Hirsch
article en

Abstract

This article reevaluates the genre and structure of the “First Theological Oration” (or. 27) of Gregory of Nazianzus. At stake in understanding these aspects of the speech is our sense of its actual tone and tenor, and consequently its place in the rhetorical “program” of Gregory’s Constantinopolitan orations. Because it is not written as an “invective” (ψόγος), as is often claimed, or. 27 may admit of a more dialogic reading than previous interpreters have allowed. By attending more closely to Gregory’s use of traditional language, the role of his syntax in disclosing the structure of the speech, and the ways in which traditional editorial conventions have sometimes obscured this structure, this article recasts or. 27 as chiefly an exercise in protreptic (προτροπή). Moreover, it suggests that or. 27 is evidence that a spirit of dialogue, and not of contempt, is likely to have typified Gregory’s rhetorical stance toward his opponents in Constantinople, prior to the autumn of 380.

Sacris ErudiriVol. 63
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Classical Antiquity Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.