Pre‐oxygenation in patients living with obesity

We read with interest the recent best practice recommendations on airway management in patients living with obesity [1]. We are concerned about the recommendation that patients should be pre-oxygenated in a ramped, head-up position with a high inspiratory fraction of oxygen. There was no mention of the use of spontaneous facemask positive pressure ventilation during the pre-oxygenation period. There was also no mention of the reverse Trendelenburg position as an alternative to the 30° head-up ramped position during pre-oxygenation. In our recent randomised controlled trial [2], we compared the effect of two techniques on the duration of the safe apnoea period after pre-oxygenation in patients living with obesity. The comparison was made between a ramped position combined with spontaneous facemask breathing without positive pressure, and pre-oxygenation in a reverse Trendelenburg position with inspiratory pressure support of 8 cmH2O and a peak end-expiratory pressure of 10 cmH2O. We found a longer safe apnoea period in the reverse Trendelenburg group (258 (55.1) vs. 217 (42.3) s; p = 0.005). Other benefits associated with this technique were also reported [2]. We based our reverse Trendelenburg positive pressure technique on a physiological assessment of the functional residual capacity using different combinations of body position and ventilation strategies in awake patients before bariatric surgery [3]. An increase in functional residual capacity was observed when spontaneous ventilation without positive pressure was converted to positive pressure ventilation. Moreover, compared with supine positioning, the ramped position had no measurable impact on the functional residual capacity. The reverse Trendelenburg position was the only position that resulted in an improved functional residual capacity regardless of the ventilation strategy used [3]. We believe that reverse Trendelenburg positioning with the use of positive pressure ventilation in spontaneously breathing patients living with obesity should be recommended for safer pre-oxygenation in this highly vulnerable population.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Anaesthesia
Published
2025-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.70043
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Airway Management and Intubation Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.19
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pre‐oxygenation in patients living with obesity

Étienne J. Couture, Jean S. Bussières
1 citations
Anaesthesia
Airway Management and Intubation Techniques
2.19
article

Pre‐oxygenation in patients living with obesity

Étienne J. Couture, Jean S. Bussières
article en
1 citations

Abstract

We read with interest the recent best practice recommendations on airway management in patients living with obesity [1]. We are concerned about the recommendation that patients should be pre-oxygenated in a ramped, head-up position with a high inspiratory fraction of oxygen. There was no mention of the use of spontaneous facemask positive pressure ventilation during the pre-oxygenation period. There was also no mention of the reverse Trendelenburg position as an alternative to the 30° head-up ramped position during pre-oxygenation. In our recent randomised controlled trial [2], we compared the effect of two techniques on the duration of the safe apnoea period after pre-oxygenation in patients living with obesity. The comparison was made between a ramped position combined with spontaneous facemask breathing without positive pressure, and pre-oxygenation in a reverse Trendelenburg position with inspiratory pressure support of 8 cmH2O and a peak end-expiratory pressure of 10 cmH2O. We found a longer safe apnoea period in the reverse Trendelenburg group (258 (55.1) vs. 217 (42.3) s; p = 0.005). Other benefits associated with this technique were also reported [2]. We based our reverse Trendelenburg positive pressure technique on a physiological assessment of the functional residual capacity using different combinations of body position and ventilation strategies in awake patients before bariatric surgery [3]. An increase in functional residual capacity was observed when spontaneous ventilation without positive pressure was converted to positive pressure ventilation. Moreover, compared with supine positioning, the ramped position had no measurable impact on the functional residual capacity. The reverse Trendelenburg position was the only position that resulted in an improved functional residual capacity regardless of the ventilation strategy used [3]. We believe that reverse Trendelenburg positioning with the use of positive pressure ventilation in spontaneously breathing patients living with obesity should be recommended for safer pre-oxygenation in this highly vulnerable population.

Anaesthesia
Université Laval (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Airway Management and Intubation Techniques
2.19
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.