Historical Science in the North Caucasus: Trajectories of Research Discourses

The article attempts to trace the vector of intellectual discourse in the study of key events in the history of the North Caucasus during the XVIII–XIX centuries. We are talking about the theoretical and methodological problems that researchers in the national republics of the North Caucasus faced in the post-Soviet years. A review of recent historiography shows that not all regional communities have managed to overcome the inertia of the Marxist-Leninist methodology with its outdated principle of presenting material and linear interpretations of historical events. The older generation of historians bogged down in archaic stereotypes of historical writing, content only with shifting evaluative accents. The trend towards expanding the theoretical field of research, based on modern methodological techniques and updated conceptual tools, has not yet become dominant, although the number of works that take into account the idea of the multivariate historical process is steadily growing.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Territory Journal of Historical Research
Published
2025-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17323/tjhr.2025.3.28658
Primary Topic
Arctic and Russian Policy Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Historical Science in the North Caucasus: Trajectories of Research Discourses

Lyudmila S. Gatagova
Territory Journal of Historical Research
Arctic and Russian Policy Studies
article

Historical Science in the North Caucasus: Trajectories of Research Discourses

Lyudmila S. Gatagova
article en

Abstract

The article attempts to trace the vector of intellectual discourse in the study of key events in the history of the North Caucasus during the XVIII–XIX centuries. We are talking about the theoretical and methodological problems that researchers in the national republics of the North Caucasus faced in the post-Soviet years. A review of recent historiography shows that not all regional communities have managed to overcome the inertia of the Marxist-Leninist methodology with its outdated principle of presenting material and linear interpretations of historical events. The older generation of historians bogged down in archaic stereotypes of historical writing, content only with shifting evaluative accents. The trend towards expanding the theoretical field of research, based on modern methodological techniques and updated conceptual tools, has not yet become dominant, although the number of works that take into account the idea of the multivariate historical process is steadily growing.

Territory Journal of Historical ResearchVol. 1(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Arctic and Russian Policy Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.