Negative natural properties, categories, and mistakes

Abstract I develop a theory of naturalness according to which properties are natural relative to categories of objects. This new theory avoids a problem that, I argue, afflicts standard theories: whereas standard theories allow for only one ordering of properties, considerations of the similarity and dissimilarity made by some negative properties—like having no parts , having no members , having no determinate mass , reflecting no visible light —require admitting more than one. Additionally, I argue that my view accounts for genuine categories, category mistakes, and negation as privation, and that it accounts for a distinction between characterizing and non-characterizing fundamentality.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Synthese
Published
2025-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-025-05294-y
Primary Topic
Philosophy and Theoretical Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Negative natural properties, categories, and mistakes

Thiago Xavier de Melo
Synthese
Philosophy and Theoretical Science
article

Negative natural properties, categories, and mistakes

Thiago Xavier de Melo
article en

Abstract

Abstract I develop a theory of naturalness according to which properties are natural relative to categories of objects. This new theory avoids a problem that, I argue, afflicts standard theories: whereas standard theories allow for only one ordering of properties, considerations of the similarity and dissimilarity made by some negative properties—like having no parts , having no members , having no determinate mass , reflecting no visible light —require admitting more than one. Additionally, I argue that my view accounts for genuine categories, category mistakes, and negation as privation, and that it accounts for a distinction between characterizing and non-characterizing fundamentality.

SyntheseVol. 206(5)
Syracuse University (US)
Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Philosophy and Theoretical Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.