Movement of deception in motion capture

Deception detection has attracted broad interest in professional practice and academic research, and body movement is considered one of the key aspects in deception detection. Previous work has focused on certain body parts (i.e., hand, head, leg) or gestures (i.e., gaze aversion, leg unnatural movement, etc.), which were manually coded by human judges. However, manual coding of nonverbal behavior is time-consuming and painstaking to the coders, as well as possibly vulnerable to observation biases. To overcome the challenges associated with manual coding, we employed a motion capture system to collect the body movements, in which a total of 80 participants were engaged in two interviews about their holiday experiences. In interviews about their vacation experiences, participants either told the whole truth or lied completely. The results revealed distinct movement patterns across conditions. Lower body movement differentiated honest from deceptive responses, and this association was moderated by task order, whereas upper body movement showed no reliable effects once task order was taken into account. Notably, the pattern does not support a generalized "rigidity effect" (i.e., uniformly reduced movement during deception); instead, the observed movement differences were order-dependent. Exploratory analyses using machine learning approaches further delineated the temporal dynamics of deceptive movement, providing complementary insights into nonverbal markers of deception.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-20163-x
Primary Topic
Deception detection and forensic psychology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Movement of deception in motion capture

Ken Fujiwara, Seunghyun Lee
Scientific Reports
Deception detection and forensic psychology
article

Movement of deception in motion capture

Ken Fujiwara, Seunghyun Lee
article en

Abstract

Deception detection has attracted broad interest in professional practice and academic research, and body movement is considered one of the key aspects in deception detection. Previous work has focused on certain body parts (i.e., hand, head, leg) or gestures (i.e., gaze aversion, leg unnatural movement, etc.), which were manually coded by human judges. However, manual coding of nonverbal behavior is time-consuming and painstaking to the coders, as well as possibly vulnerable to observation biases. To overcome the challenges associated with manual coding, we employed a motion capture system to collect the body movements, in which a total of 80 participants were engaged in two interviews about their holiday experiences. In interviews about their vacation experiences, participants either told the whole truth or lied completely. The results revealed distinct movement patterns across conditions. Lower body movement differentiated honest from deceptive responses, and this association was moderated by task order, whereas upper body movement showed no reliable effects once task order was taken into account. Notably, the pattern does not support a generalized "rigidity effect" (i.e., uniformly reduced movement during deception); instead, the observed movement differences were order-dependent. Exploratory analyses using machine learning approaches further delineated the temporal dynamics of deceptive movement, providing complementary insights into nonverbal markers of deception.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
National Chung Cheng University (TW)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Deception detection and forensic psychology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.