Comparative Evaluation of Surface Roughness in CAD/CAM-milled, 3D-printed, and Conventional Polymethyl Methacrylate Denture Base Resin Materials: An In-vivo Study

Introduction: The surface roughness of denture-base resins significantly affects biofilm accumulation, aesthetics, and patient comfort. With advances in digital dentistry, CAD/CAM-milled and 3D-printed resins offer new fabrication options; however, their surface properties require further validation under clinical conditions. Aim: To compare and evaluate the surface roughness of CAD/ CAM-milled, 3D-printed, and conventional heat-polymerised acrylic Denture Base Materials (DBMs) under in-vivo conditions. Materials and Methods: A comparative clinical in-vivo study was conducted in the Department of Prosthodontics, Hitkarini Dental College and Hospital, Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh, India, from August 2023 to February 2025 on 270 disc specimens fabricated and equally distributed among three groups (n=90): Group A-CAD/CAM-milled; Group B-3D-printed; Group C-conventional heat-polymerised resin. Denture-base samples (6×2 mm) were embedded in the flanges of the dentures. After three and six-months of clinical use, the samples were retrieved and surface roughness was assessed using a contact profilometer; mean roughness values (Ra) were recorded and subjected to statistical analysis. Results: The CAD/CAM-milled resin consistently showed the lowest surface roughness at all time points, whereas 3Dprinted resin exhibited the highest. Conventional PMMA resin showed an intermediate value. The interaction effect of material type and time was statistically significant (F=13271.91, p<0.05), confirming that CAD/CAM-milled resin maintained the smoothest surface, whereas 3D-printed resin demonstrated the greatest roughness progression over time. Differences among all three groups were statistically significant (p<0.001). Conclusion: The CAD/CAM-milled denture-base resins demonstrated superior surface smoothness compared with 3D-printed and conventional materials. The smoother surface of milled resins may promote better hygiene, reduce plaque accumulation, and enhance patient comfort, supporting their use in long-term prosthodontic care.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH
Published
2025-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7860/jcdr/2025/82215.22041
Primary Topic
Dental materials and restorations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Evaluation of Surface Roughness in CAD/CAM-milled, 3D-printed, and Conventional Polymethyl Methacrylate Denture Base Resin Materials: An In-vivo Study

S. Nayak, Sneha Mantri, Puneet Kumar Gupta, S. Nitin et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH
Dental materials and restorations
article

Comparative Evaluation of Surface Roughness in CAD/CAM-milled, 3D-printed, and Conventional Polymethyl Methacrylate Denture Base Resin Materials: An In-vivo Study

S. Nayak, Sneha Mantri, Puneet Kumar Gupta, S. Nitin, Abhilasha Bhasin
article en

Abstract

Introduction: The surface roughness of denture-base resins significantly affects biofilm accumulation, aesthetics, and patient comfort. With advances in digital dentistry, CAD/CAM-milled and 3D-printed resins offer new fabrication options; however, their surface properties require further validation under clinical conditions. Aim: To compare and evaluate the surface roughness of CAD/ CAM-milled, 3D-printed, and conventional heat-polymerised acrylic Denture Base Materials (DBMs) under in-vivo conditions. Materials and Methods: A comparative clinical in-vivo study was conducted in the Department of Prosthodontics, Hitkarini Dental College and Hospital, Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh, India, from August 2023 to February 2025 on 270 disc specimens fabricated and equally distributed among three groups (n=90): Group A-CAD/CAM-milled; Group B-3D-printed; Group C-conventional heat-polymerised resin. Denture-base samples (6×2 mm) were embedded in the flanges of the dentures. After three and six-months of clinical use, the samples were retrieved and surface roughness was assessed using a contact profilometer; mean roughness values (Ra) were recorded and subjected to statistical analysis. Results: The CAD/CAM-milled resin consistently showed the lowest surface roughness at all time points, whereas 3Dprinted resin exhibited the highest. Conventional PMMA resin showed an intermediate value. The interaction effect of material type and time was statistically significant (F=13271.91, p<0.05), confirming that CAD/CAM-milled resin maintained the smoothest surface, whereas 3D-printed resin demonstrated the greatest roughness progression over time. Differences among all three groups were statistically significant (p<0.001). Conclusion: The CAD/CAM-milled denture-base resins demonstrated superior surface smoothness compared with 3D-printed and conventional materials. The smoother surface of milled resins may promote better hygiene, reduce plaque accumulation, and enhance patient comfort, supporting their use in long-term prosthodontic care.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Dental materials and restorations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.