Blocked and “Unblocked” Learning: Structural Factors That Impede and Enable Evidence‐Informed Policymaking

ABSTRACT This article addresses a critical issue in evidence‐informed policymaking: the challenge of translating knowledge into policy outputs amidst the complex interplay between research and politics. It discusses the concept of “blocked learning,” where individual‐level learning fails to scale up to organizational and policy levels, thus impeding evidence‐informed policymaking. The analysis identifies three primary factors that obstruct this knowledge transfer: weak organizational capacity characterized by a rigid and fragmented administrative environment, difficulties in data collection, and a lack of policy evaluation culture; the over‐politicization of expertise and public administration; and the absence of collaboration between public sector actors and civil society. Drawing on secondary literature and empirical data from a study of policy learning within European soft law instruments in Greece, Italy, and Spain, the article offers a comparative analysis of these factors. Furthermore, the article discusses solutions to unblock learning and to improve the integration of evidence into policy practices.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Policy Analysis
Published
2025-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/epa2.70025
Primary Topic
Policy Transfer and Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Blocked and “Unblocked” Learning: Structural Factors That Impede and Enable Evidence‐Informed Policymaking

Thenia Vagionaki
European Policy Analysis
Policy Transfer and Learning
article

Blocked and “Unblocked” Learning: Structural Factors That Impede and Enable Evidence‐Informed Policymaking

Thenia Vagionaki
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This article addresses a critical issue in evidence‐informed policymaking: the challenge of translating knowledge into policy outputs amidst the complex interplay between research and politics. It discusses the concept of “blocked learning,” where individual‐level learning fails to scale up to organizational and policy levels, thus impeding evidence‐informed policymaking. The analysis identifies three primary factors that obstruct this knowledge transfer: weak organizational capacity characterized by a rigid and fragmented administrative environment, difficulties in data collection, and a lack of policy evaluation culture; the over‐politicization of expertise and public administration; and the absence of collaboration between public sector actors and civil society. Drawing on secondary literature and empirical data from a study of policy learning within European soft law instruments in Greece, Italy, and Spain, the article offers a comparative analysis of these factors. Furthermore, the article discusses solutions to unblock learning and to improve the integration of evidence into policy practices.

European Policy Analysis
Princeton University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Policy Transfer and Learning
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Blocked and “Unblocked” Learning: Structural Factors That Impede and Enable Evidence‐Informed Policymaking — Thenia Vagionaki · European Policy Analysis (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS