The Value of Persons: A Pragmatic Approach

Valuating persons is a familiar activity, one that we all perform on a daily basis in relation to our loved ones, colleagues, neighbors, representatives, celebrities or even fictional characters. Yet, despite its familiarity, the issue of valuating persons has hardly ever been addressed by the social sciences in a pragmatic and comprehensive perspective. As with any kind of valuations, those centered on individuals align with implicit rules that make them more or less effective or credible. Those rules belong to an ‘axiological grammar’ rendering explicit a wide range of worth proofs (from status to talent, physical appearance or deeds), the decisive role of evaluation ‘tests’ (exams, competitions, public performances) and, finally, the inevitable designing of hierarchies, through comparison, which put the value of equality to the test. Proofs, tests and hierarchies are the major stages in the ordinary production of inequalities through the valuation of persons.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Theory Culture & Society
Published
2025-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/02632764251377702
Primary Topic
Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Value of Persons: A Pragmatic Approach

Nathalie Heinich
Theory Culture & Society
Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism
article

The Value of Persons: A Pragmatic Approach

Nathalie Heinich
article en

Abstract

Valuating persons is a familiar activity, one that we all perform on a daily basis in relation to our loved ones, colleagues, neighbors, representatives, celebrities or even fictional characters. Yet, despite its familiarity, the issue of valuating persons has hardly ever been addressed by the social sciences in a pragmatic and comprehensive perspective. As with any kind of valuations, those centered on individuals align with implicit rules that make them more or less effective or credible. Those rules belong to an ‘axiological grammar’ rendering explicit a wide range of worth proofs (from status to talent, physical appearance or deeds), the decisive role of evaluation ‘tests’ (exams, competitions, public performances) and, finally, the inevitable designing of hierarchies, through comparison, which put the value of equality to the test. Proofs, tests and hierarchies are the major stages in the ordinary production of inequalities through the valuation of persons.

Theory Culture & SocietyVol. 43(1)
National Council for Scientific Research (LB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.