Learning curve for robotic-assisted hiatal hernia repair determined by cumulative analysis of adjusted operative times

The aim of this study was to assess the learning curve of robotic-assisted hiatal hernia repair. Patients undergoing robotic-assisted hiatal hernia repair from May 2018 to April 2024 were retrospectively included. Clinical characteristics, operative times, and postoperative data were collected. A cumulative summation (CUSUM) analysis of operative times, adjusted for surgical complexity, was conducted. We selected 101 patients who underwent robotic-assisted hiatal hernia repair performed by three surgeons. The mean age was 65.7 ± 14.3 years, with 69 (68.3%) female patients. Adjusted operative times were calculated based on hernia type, age, sex, BMI, and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score. The CUSUM analysis estimated the learning curve to be between 15 and 21 cases. Only one minor intraoperative complication occurred. Postoperatively, 19 (18.8%) complications were observed, with only 3 (3.0%) classified as grade 3 according to the Clavien-Dindo classification. Complications were evenly distributed between the learning and post-learning phases. After a mean follow-up of 26.5 ± 18.0 months, 13 (12.9%) cases of recurrence were recorded, none of which required surgical revision. Experienced surgeons performing robotic-assisted hiatal hernia repair seem to have a rapid learning curve. A significant reduction in operative time was observed after 15 to 21 cases.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-20138-y
Primary Topic
Esophageal and GI Pathology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Learning curve for robotic-assisted hiatal hernia repair determined by cumulative analysis of adjusted operative times

Fabiano Iaquinandi, Andrea Saporito, Luciana Paula Cadore Stefani, Paolo Gaffuri et al.
Scientific Reports
Esophageal and GI Pathology
article

Learning curve for robotic-assisted hiatal hernia repair determined by cumulative analysis of adjusted operative times

Fabiano Iaquinandi, Andrea Saporito, Luciana Paula Cadore Stefani, Paolo Gaffuri, Davide La Regina, Francesco Mongelli, Fabio Garofalo
article en

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the learning curve of robotic-assisted hiatal hernia repair. Patients undergoing robotic-assisted hiatal hernia repair from May 2018 to April 2024 were retrospectively included. Clinical characteristics, operative times, and postoperative data were collected. A cumulative summation (CUSUM) analysis of operative times, adjusted for surgical complexity, was conducted. We selected 101 patients who underwent robotic-assisted hiatal hernia repair performed by three surgeons. The mean age was 65.7 ± 14.3 years, with 69 (68.3%) female patients. Adjusted operative times were calculated based on hernia type, age, sex, BMI, and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score. The CUSUM analysis estimated the learning curve to be between 15 and 21 cases. Only one minor intraoperative complication occurred. Postoperatively, 19 (18.8%) complications were observed, with only 3 (3.0%) classified as grade 3 according to the Clavien-Dindo classification. Complications were evenly distributed between the learning and post-learning phases. After a mean follow-up of 26.5 ± 18.0 months, 13 (12.9%) cases of recurrence were recorded, none of which required surgical revision. Experienced surgeons performing robotic-assisted hiatal hernia repair seem to have a rapid learning curve. A significant reduction in operative time was observed after 15 to 21 cases.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
Ospedale regionale di Lugano (CH), Ospedale Regionale di Bellinzona e Valli (CH), Università della Svizzera italiana (CH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Esophageal and GI Pathology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Learning curve for robotic-assisted hiatal hernia repair determined by cumulative analysis of adjusted operative times — Fabiano Iaquinandi, Andrea Saporito, et al. · Scientific Reports (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS