Biomechanical comparison of suture and screw fixation in PCL avulsion with variable bone quality

Various fixation techniques, including screws and suture-based methods, are used for posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) avulsion fractures. This study compared the biomechanical effects of different suture configurations in simulated PCL avulsion fractures. Twenty cadaveric knees were assigned to four fixation groups: antegrade screw (A), 1 suture tape with 2 tunnels (B), 2 suture tapes with 2 tunnels (C), and 2 suture tapes with 3 tunnels (D). Biomechanical testing included cyclic loading and load-to-failure tests, with elongation, stiffness, yield load, and failure modes recorded. No significant differences were found between groups (p > 0.05). Mean elongation ranged from 10.1 ± 2.9 mm (B) to 21.9 ± 15.9 mm (D), while mean yield load varied from 375.6 ± 110.9 N (C) to 428.6 ± 197.6 N (B). Fragment breakage was common in Groups A and D, while suture cut-through occurred in Groups B and C. Across all groups, bone mineral density (BMD) significantly correlated with yield load (r = 0.511, p = 0.021) and elongation (r = -0.553, p = 0.0110.Suture-based techniques provided comparable biomechanical performance to screws, and increasing suture tapes or tunnels did not enhance fixation strength. Bone quality should be considered when planning fixation and rehabilitation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-20106-6
Primary Topic
Shoulder Injury and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Biomechanical comparison of suture and screw fixation in PCL avulsion with variable bone quality

Panya Aroonjarattham, Chompunut Somtua, Nadhaporn Saengpetch, Sorawut Thamyongkit et al.
Scientific Reports
Shoulder Injury and Treatment
article

Biomechanical comparison of suture and screw fixation in PCL avulsion with variable bone quality

Panya Aroonjarattham, Chompunut Somtua, Nadhaporn Saengpetch, Sorawut Thamyongkit, Benrita Jitaree, Nattawat Rattanapan, Pasit Komonsuwan
article en

Abstract

Various fixation techniques, including screws and suture-based methods, are used for posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) avulsion fractures. This study compared the biomechanical effects of different suture configurations in simulated PCL avulsion fractures. Twenty cadaveric knees were assigned to four fixation groups: antegrade screw (A), 1 suture tape with 2 tunnels (B), 2 suture tapes with 2 tunnels (C), and 2 suture tapes with 3 tunnels (D). Biomechanical testing included cyclic loading and load-to-failure tests, with elongation, stiffness, yield load, and failure modes recorded. No significant differences were found between groups (p > 0.05). Mean elongation ranged from 10.1 ± 2.9 mm (B) to 21.9 ± 15.9 mm (D), while mean yield load varied from 375.6 ± 110.9 N (C) to 428.6 ± 197.6 N (B). Fragment breakage was common in Groups A and D, while suture cut-through occurred in Groups B and C. Across all groups, bone mineral density (BMD) significantly correlated with yield load (r = 0.511, p = 0.021) and elongation (r = -0.553, p = 0.0110.Suture-based techniques provided comparable biomechanical performance to screws, and increasing suture tapes or tunnels did not enhance fixation strength. Bone quality should be considered when planning fixation and rehabilitation.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
Mahidol University (TH), Ramathibodi Hospital (TH), Rangsit University (TH)
Mahidol University, Rangsit University
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Shoulder Injury and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.