Unveiling Psychological Responses to COVID-19: Psychometric Properties of the Mental Impact and Distress Scale in Hong Kong Adults

Abstract The COVID-19 pandemic poses substantial challenges to individuals’ physical and mental health. The Mental Impact and Distress Scale: COVID-19 (MIDc-PR) was developed as a transdiagnostic assessment tool to evaluate respondents’ psychological responses to the pandemic. The present study examined the psychometric properties of MIDc-PR within the Chinese context. A total of 1,122 Hong Kong adults completed an online questionnaire including the 24-item MIDc-PR and additional measures assessing situational impact, resilience, and well-being across three separate assessment waves between October 2020 and October 2021. Dimensionality was assessed through exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses conducted on two split-half subsamples. Convergent validity was evaluated by examining associations with situational impact, resilience, and well-being. Exploratory factor analysis reduced MIDc-PR to 19 items and supported a two-factor (anticipation and modulation) model in both subsamples, demonstrating good reliability. Both factors showed scalar measurement invariance across subsamples, gender, age groups, and assessment waves. Both factors were significantly associated with higher situational impact and lower resilience and well-being. Participants recruited in 2021 reported lower levels of anticipation and modulation than those recruited in 2020. These findings provide empirical support for the psychometric robustness of MIDc-PR as a valid and reliable tool for assessing psychological responses to COVID-19 among Hong Kong adults.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment
Published
2025-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-025-10254-4
Primary Topic
COVID-19 and Mental Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Unveiling Psychological Responses to COVID-19: Psychometric Properties of the Mental Impact and Distress Scale in Hong Kong Adults

Ted C. T. Fong, Floria H. N. Chio, Kay Chang, Rth Ho
Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment
COVID-19 and Mental Health
article

Unveiling Psychological Responses to COVID-19: Psychometric Properties of the Mental Impact and Distress Scale in Hong Kong Adults

Ted C. T. Fong, Floria H. N. Chio, Kay Chang, Rth Ho
article en

Abstract

Abstract The COVID-19 pandemic poses substantial challenges to individuals’ physical and mental health. The Mental Impact and Distress Scale: COVID-19 (MIDc-PR) was developed as a transdiagnostic assessment tool to evaluate respondents’ psychological responses to the pandemic. The present study examined the psychometric properties of MIDc-PR within the Chinese context. A total of 1,122 Hong Kong adults completed an online questionnaire including the 24-item MIDc-PR and additional measures assessing situational impact, resilience, and well-being across three separate assessment waves between October 2020 and October 2021. Dimensionality was assessed through exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses conducted on two split-half subsamples. Convergent validity was evaluated by examining associations with situational impact, resilience, and well-being. Exploratory factor analysis reduced MIDc-PR to 19 items and supported a two-factor (anticipation and modulation) model in both subsamples, demonstrating good reliability. Both factors showed scalar measurement invariance across subsamples, gender, age groups, and assessment waves. Both factors were significantly associated with higher situational impact and lower resilience and well-being. Participants recruited in 2021 reported lower levels of anticipation and modulation than those recruited in 2020. These findings provide empirical support for the psychometric robustness of MIDc-PR as a valid and reliable tool for assessing psychological responses to COVID-19 among Hong Kong adults.

Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral AssessmentVol. 47(4)
Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK), University of Macau (MO), University of Hong Kong (HK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
COVID-19 and Mental Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Unveiling Psychological Responses to COVID-19: Psychometric Properties of the Mental Impact and Distress Scale in Hong Kong Adults — Ted C. T. Fong, Floria H. N. Chio, et al. · Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS