Biafra Since 1999: Common Cause Versus a Divided Interest in the Struggle for the Creation of Nationhood

Abstract This article examines institutional fragmentation among key organisations in charge of Biafra’s struggle for independence since the year 2000. The article argues that contrary to the mainstream explanations, which attribute the split to the differences in tactics between organisations (Duruji 2012) or their relations with the state (Kalyvas 2008; Cunningham 2014), organisational cohesion is largely absent due to the struggle for power and resources among the leaders in charge of the organisations. Supported by the in-depth interviews with key informants, we treat Biafran secessionist organisations as business models through which leading politicians act as political entrepreneurs and engage in predatory rent-seeking practices to maximise profits and power through the institutions that represent the collective struggle.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nationalities Papers
Published
2025-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/nps.2025.10068
Primary Topic
Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Biafra Since 1999: Common Cause Versus a Divided Interest in the Struggle for the Creation of Nationhood

Assel Tutumlu, Gabriel Aza Nyor
Nationalities Papers
Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics
article

Biafra Since 1999: Common Cause Versus a Divided Interest in the Struggle for the Creation of Nationhood

Assel Tutumlu, Gabriel Aza Nyor
article en

Abstract

Abstract This article examines institutional fragmentation among key organisations in charge of Biafra’s struggle for independence since the year 2000. The article argues that contrary to the mainstream explanations, which attribute the split to the differences in tactics between organisations (Duruji 2012) or their relations with the state (Kalyvas 2008; Cunningham 2014), organisational cohesion is largely absent due to the struggle for power and resources among the leaders in charge of the organisations. Supported by the in-depth interviews with key informants, we treat Biafran secessionist organisations as business models through which leading politicians act as political entrepreneurs and engage in predatory rent-seeking practices to maximise profits and power through the institutions that represent the collective struggle.

Nationalities Papers
Near East University (CY)
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Biafra Since 1999: Common Cause Versus a Divided Interest in the Struggle for the Creation of Nationhood — Assel Tutumlu, Gabriel Aza Nyor · Nationalities Papers (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS