Design and Thermodynamic Analysis of CO2 Liquefaction Processes for Onboard Carbon Capture and Storage

This study evaluates the thermodynamic performance of the following two CO2 liquefaction processes for onboard carbon capture and storage (OCCS) on a 174,000 m3 LNG carrier: the Linde–Hampson and vapor compression refrigeration cycles. The cycles were designed based on realistic vessel operating conditions and compared using the specific energy consumption (SEC) as the primary performance indicator, alongside the coefficient of performance (COP). To enable a fair comparison of the two distinct cycles, a complementary COP metric was validated for the open-loop Linde–Hampson cycle by establishing a system-level definition of heat removal. The validity of this metric was confirmed by demonstrating that its optimal point (maximum COP) aligns with that of the primary metric (minimum SEC), ensuring thermodynamic consistency. The analysis reveals that the vapor compression cycle demonstrates superior performance, achieving an 8.35% higher COP and an 11.45% lower SEC than the Linde–Hampson cycle. This work provides a consistent methodology for the comparative assessment of open- and closed-loop liquefaction systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Marine Science and Engineering
Published
2025-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse13101976
Primary Topic
Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Design and Thermodynamic Analysis of CO2 Liquefaction Processes for Onboard Carbon Capture and Storage

Jinkwang Lee, Sejun Park, Yujin Cheon, Sangmin Ji
Journal of Marine Science and Engineering
Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
article

Design and Thermodynamic Analysis of CO2 Liquefaction Processes for Onboard Carbon Capture and Storage

Jinkwang Lee, Sejun Park, Yujin Cheon, Sangmin Ji
article en

Abstract

This study evaluates the thermodynamic performance of the following two CO2 liquefaction processes for onboard carbon capture and storage (OCCS) on a 174,000 m3 LNG carrier: the Linde–Hampson and vapor compression refrigeration cycles. The cycles were designed based on realistic vessel operating conditions and compared using the specific energy consumption (SEC) as the primary performance indicator, alongside the coefficient of performance (COP). To enable a fair comparison of the two distinct cycles, a complementary COP metric was validated for the open-loop Linde–Hampson cycle by establishing a system-level definition of heat removal. The validity of this metric was confirmed by demonstrating that its optimal point (maximum COP) aligns with that of the primary metric (minimum SEC), ensuring thermodynamic consistency. The analysis reveals that the vapor compression cycle demonstrates superior performance, achieving an 8.35% higher COP and an 11.45% lower SEC than the Linde–Hampson cycle. This work provides a consistent methodology for the comparative assessment of open- and closed-loop liquefaction systems.

Journal of Marine Science and EngineeringVol. 13(10)
Changwon National University (KR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Design and Thermodynamic Analysis of CO2 Liquefaction Processes for Onboard Carbon Capture and Storage — Jinkwang Lee, Sejun Park, et al. · Journal of Marine Science and Engineering (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS