Managed decline: Muddling through with the Sterling (dis)Agreements, 1968–74

Abstract How do policymakers manage the decline of an international currency? This paper revisits the view that the ‘Sterling Agreements’ of 1968–74 – bilateral contracts between the UK and sterling‐holding governments – marked a successful paradigm shift towards sterling's managed ‘retirement’. Archival evidence reveals no strategic coherence to British policy in this period, a case of ‘muddling through’. Phased reductions in the amount of sterling protected by ‘guarantee’ were presented as steps on a path to ‘winding down’ sterling. But, when given options, British officials prioritized maintaining, rather than reducing, international sterling holdings, and the Agreements, if anything, tended to encourage their increase. Sterling's relative decline resulted more from sterling area countries seeking financial freedom, as the Bank of England – the Agreements’ designer and defender – lost policy influence.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Economic History Review
Published
2025-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/ehr.70057
Primary Topic
Political and Economic history of UK and US
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Managed decline: Muddling through with the Sterling (dis)Agreements, 1968–74

Francis Kennedy, David P. Jordan, Jack Seddon, Alan de Bromhead
The Economic History Review
Political and Economic history of UK and US
article

Managed decline: Muddling through with the Sterling (dis)Agreements, 1968–74

Francis Kennedy, David P. Jordan, Jack Seddon, Alan de Bromhead
article en

Abstract

Abstract How do policymakers manage the decline of an international currency? This paper revisits the view that the ‘Sterling Agreements’ of 1968–74 – bilateral contracts between the UK and sterling‐holding governments – marked a successful paradigm shift towards sterling's managed ‘retirement’. Archival evidence reveals no strategic coherence to British policy in this period, a case of ‘muddling through’. Phased reductions in the amount of sterling protected by ‘guarantee’ were presented as steps on a path to ‘winding down’ sterling. But, when given options, British officials prioritized maintaining, rather than reducing, international sterling holdings, and the Agreements, if anything, tended to encourage their increase. Sterling's relative decline resulted more from sterling area countries seeking financial freedom, as the Bank of England – the Agreements’ designer and defender – lost policy influence.

The Economic History Review
University College Dublin (IE), Queen's University Belfast (GB), Waseda University (JP)
Economic and Social Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Political and Economic history of UK and US
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Managed decline: Muddling through with the Sterling (dis)Agreements, 1968–74 — Francis Kennedy, David P. Jordan, et al. · The Economic History Review (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS