False labeling and double standards in the populist discourse of the Law and Justice party when it became the opposition

The aim of the study is to analyze false labeling and double standards in the populist discourse of the “new” opposition – the Law and Justice (PiS) party, which lost the 2023 Polish parliamentary elections after 8 years rule. The data used in the study come from our corpus of Polish political discourse. The theoretical framework within which the analysis has been conducted is the Discourse-Historical Approach to Critical Discourse Studies. The discourse has been analyzed in terms of its content, discursive strategies, linguistic expressions and rhetorical devices and context. The main findings of the study allowed us to formulate the following conclusions: The PiS party evaluation of the Polish political reality involves double standards and the biased use of false labeling. PiS rhetoric resembles Hitler’s and Donald Trump’s rhetorical styles. The strategy “call them what they call you” is frequently employed in negative presentations of the current governing coalition.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Discourse & Society
Published
2025-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/09579265251380603
Primary Topic
Populism, Right-Wing Movements
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

False labeling and double standards in the populist discourse of the Law and Justice party when it became the opposition

Ewa Bogdanowska-Jakubowska, Nika Bogdanowska
Discourse & Society
Populism, Right-Wing Movements
article

False labeling and double standards in the populist discourse of the Law and Justice party when it became the opposition

Ewa Bogdanowska-Jakubowska, Nika Bogdanowska
article en

Abstract

The aim of the study is to analyze false labeling and double standards in the populist discourse of the “new” opposition – the Law and Justice (PiS) party, which lost the 2023 Polish parliamentary elections after 8 years rule. The data used in the study come from our corpus of Polish political discourse. The theoretical framework within which the analysis has been conducted is the Discourse-Historical Approach to Critical Discourse Studies. The discourse has been analyzed in terms of its content, discursive strategies, linguistic expressions and rhetorical devices and context. The main findings of the study allowed us to formulate the following conclusions: The PiS party evaluation of the Polish political reality involves double standards and the biased use of false labeling. PiS rhetoric resembles Hitler’s and Donald Trump’s rhetorical styles. The strategy “call them what they call you” is frequently employed in negative presentations of the current governing coalition.

Discourse & Society
University of Silesia in Katowice (PL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Populism, Right-Wing Movements
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

False labeling and double standards in the populist discourse of the Law and Justice party when it became the opposition — Ewa Bogdanowska-Jakubowska, Nika Bogdanowska · Discourse & Society (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS