Academic citizenship behaviour: a bibliometric analysis and research agenda

Purpose This paper provides a rigorous bibliometric analysis of academic citizenship scholarship development. Academic citizenship has seen a long-term decline, and despite a recent surge in research interest, the field still lacks comprehensive studies and data. Design/methodology/approach Bibliometrics consists of a series of analytical procedures which are used to objectively assess a field of published outcomes by statistically analysing bibliographic datasets, normally focused on various citations and co-citations of publications. Using the Web of Science Core Collection database of academic citations, bibliometric methodologies were used to identify and analyse academic citizenship (behaviour) literature through the assimilation of a nascent dataset of research outputs and presenting the results in the data visualisation software, VOSviewer. Findings The study reveals the recent surge in interest in academic citizenship (behaviour) research. The prominent authors engaging with this method of research, their impact and the key topics arising from these studies are also revealed. Research limitations/implications The analysis undertaken can be time sensitive, as the nature of bibliometric analysis is backward looking and so can be viewed as being retrospective, as literature only appears after a period of time has lapsed and is under constant flux. Originality/value The study identifies areas where assimilations have occurred. Prospective opportunities for the further empirical development and research of academic citizenship behaviour are considered to rest in the areas of academic identity and the potential importance of the constructs of psychological contract, psychological climate and psychological capital.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Higher Education Evaluation and Development
Published
2025-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/heed-12-2024-0062
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Higher Education Governance and Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.52
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Academic citizenship behaviour: a bibliometric analysis and research agenda

Alan Johnston
1 citations
Higher Education Evaluation and Development
Higher Education Governance and Development
8.52
article

Academic citizenship behaviour: a bibliometric analysis and research agenda

Alan Johnston
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Purpose This paper provides a rigorous bibliometric analysis of academic citizenship scholarship development. Academic citizenship has seen a long-term decline, and despite a recent surge in research interest, the field still lacks comprehensive studies and data. Design/methodology/approach Bibliometrics consists of a series of analytical procedures which are used to objectively assess a field of published outcomes by statistically analysing bibliographic datasets, normally focused on various citations and co-citations of publications. Using the Web of Science Core Collection database of academic citations, bibliometric methodologies were used to identify and analyse academic citizenship (behaviour) literature through the assimilation of a nascent dataset of research outputs and presenting the results in the data visualisation software, VOSviewer. Findings The study reveals the recent surge in interest in academic citizenship (behaviour) research. The prominent authors engaging with this method of research, their impact and the key topics arising from these studies are also revealed. Research limitations/implications The analysis undertaken can be time sensitive, as the nature of bibliometric analysis is backward looking and so can be viewed as being retrospective, as literature only appears after a period of time has lapsed and is under constant flux. Originality/value The study identifies areas where assimilations have occurred. Prospective opportunities for the further empirical development and research of academic citizenship behaviour are considered to rest in the areas of academic identity and the potential importance of the constructs of psychological contract, psychological climate and psychological capital.

Higher Education Evaluation and DevelopmentVol. 19(2)
York St John University (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Higher Education Governance and Development
8.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.