The Weekend Effect in Online Reviews

This article finds that online reviews submitted during the weekend tend to have lower rating scores than reviews submitted during the week. Analyzing 400 million reviews across 33 e-commerce, hospitality, entertainment, and employer platforms, the authors find that weekend reviews have a 3% lower relative share of 5-star ratings and a 6% higher relative share of 1-, 2-, or 3-star ratings compared with weekday reviews. The pattern emerges even when controlling for quality of reviewed items. This weekend effect is surprising given that studies usually report higher happiness levels and a better mood on weekends. The authors discuss several explanations related to where the review is submitted (platform characteristics), what the review is about (listing characteristics), and who submits the review (reviewer characteristics). They present evidence that temporal self-selection of reviewers is a dominant driver of the weekend effect. During the weekend, a different set of users—those more prone to write negative reviews—is more likely to leave a review. These findings complement extant research on review self-selection by adding a temporal layer to the self-selection processes inherent in online reviews. This article also highlights managerial implications by demonstrating that solicitations sent during the weekend (vs. weekday solicitation) lead to collecting more negative reviews.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Marketing Research
Published
2025-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00222437251391808
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Media Studies and Communication
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.73

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Weekend Effect in Online Reviews

Florian Stahl, Andreas Bayerl, Verena Schoenmueller, Jacob Goldenberg
2 citations
Journal of Marketing Research
Media Studies and Communication
7.73
article

The Weekend Effect in Online Reviews

Florian Stahl, Andreas Bayerl, Verena Schoenmueller, Jacob Goldenberg
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This article finds that online reviews submitted during the weekend tend to have lower rating scores than reviews submitted during the week. Analyzing 400 million reviews across 33 e-commerce, hospitality, entertainment, and employer platforms, the authors find that weekend reviews have a 3% lower relative share of 5-star ratings and a 6% higher relative share of 1-, 2-, or 3-star ratings compared with weekday reviews. The pattern emerges even when controlling for quality of reviewed items. This weekend effect is surprising given that studies usually report higher happiness levels and a better mood on weekends. The authors discuss several explanations related to where the review is submitted (platform characteristics), what the review is about (listing characteristics), and who submits the review (reviewer characteristics). They present evidence that temporal self-selection of reviewers is a dominant driver of the weekend effect. During the weekend, a different set of users—those more prone to write negative reviews—is more likely to leave a review. These findings complement extant research on review self-selection by adding a temporal layer to the self-selection processes inherent in online reviews. This article also highlights managerial implications by demonstrating that solicitations sent during the weekend (vs. weekday solicitation) lead to collecting more negative reviews.

Journal of Marketing ResearchVol. 63(2)
Israel Science Foundation, Universität Mannheim
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Media Studies and Communication
7.73
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.