Implementation of risk-reducing surgery for HBOC under public insurance in Japan: a single-center experience

6.5 months for RRM and 11.3 months for RRSO.Importantly, RRSO was significantly delayed among BRCA2 carriers compared with BRCA1 carriers (15.2 vs. 6.4 months, p = 0.02).The only three women who have continued to defer RRSO did so due to fertility considerations.Before insurance coverage, only one or two RRSO procedures were performed annually, and RRM was rare because costs exceeded JPY 1,000,000, including reconstruction.Public insurance thus played a pivotal role in expanding access to both procedures [1,2].The observed delays among BRCA2 carriers likely reflect later ovarian cancer onset and fertility considerations [3].These findings highlight the importance of individualized counseling that considers age, reproductive planning, and gene-specific risk, and multicenter studies are warranted to confirm whether our single-center experience reflects national trends.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Familial Cancer
Published
2025-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10689-025-00501-8
Primary Topic
Multiple and Secondary Primary Cancers
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Implementation of risk-reducing surgery for HBOC under public insurance in Japan: a single-center experience

Tomoyuki Aruga, Sayako Takahashi, Hiroko Terui-Kohbata, Maki Gau et al.
Familial Cancer
Multiple and Secondary Primary Cancers
article

Implementation of risk-reducing surgery for HBOC under public insurance in Japan: a single-center experience

Tomoyuki Aruga, Sayako Takahashi, Hiroko Terui-Kohbata, Maki Gau, Mariko Komine, Yusuke Ebana, Kimio Wakana, Eriko Takamine, Makiko Egawa, Masayuki Yoshida
article en

Abstract

6.5 months for RRM and 11.3 months for RRSO.Importantly, RRSO was significantly delayed among BRCA2 carriers compared with BRCA1 carriers (15.2 vs. 6.4 months, p = 0.02).The only three women who have continued to defer RRSO did so due to fertility considerations.Before insurance coverage, only one or two RRSO procedures were performed annually, and RRM was rare because costs exceeded JPY 1,000,000, including reconstruction.Public insurance thus played a pivotal role in expanding access to both procedures [1,2].The observed delays among BRCA2 carriers likely reflect later ovarian cancer onset and fertility considerations [3].These findings highlight the importance of individualized counseling that considers age, reproductive planning, and gene-specific risk, and multicenter studies are warranted to confirm whether our single-center experience reflects national trends.

Familial CancerVol. 24(4)
Tokyo Medical and Dental University (JP), Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Medical Science (JP), Tokyo Medical University Hospital (JP), University of Tokyo Hospital (JP), Perinatal Institute (GB), The Cancer Institute Hospital (JP), The University of Tokyo (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Multiple and Secondary Primary Cancers
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Implementation of risk-reducing surgery for HBOC under public insurance in Japan: a single-center experience — Tomoyuki Aruga, Sayako Takahashi, et al. · Familial Cancer (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS