Fluid management methods for severely burned patients: a narrative review

Burn shock is a major early complication in the treatment of severely burned patients, and precise and timely fluid management is essential for survival. Traditional clinical indicators such as urine output, blood pressure, central venous pressure (CVP), and blood lactate are commonly used, but each has significant limitations. Invasive hemodynamic monitoring technologies, such as Pulmonary Artery Catheterization (PAC) and Pulse Contour Cardiac Output (PiCCO), have improved the accuracy of fluid assessment, but carry risks of infection and procedural complications and require experienced clinical interpretation within the context of the patient's overall condition. Non-invasive ultrasound-based methods, including critical care ultrasonography and the Venous Excess Ultrasound Score (VExUS), are emerging as promising alternatives, particularly in resource-limited settings. This review summarizes current methods for fluid management in severely burned patients, with a focus on the concepts of fluid responsiveness and fluid tolerance, and provides recommendations for clinical practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing
Published
2025-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-025-01365-0
Primary Topic
Ultrasound in Clinical Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Fluid management methods for severely burned patients: a narrative review

Wei Liu, Yucong Li, Tianzhen Hua, Meiqing Zhang et al.
Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing
Ultrasound in Clinical Applications
article

Fluid management methods for severely burned patients: a narrative review

Wei Liu, Yucong Li, Tianzhen Hua, Meiqing Zhang, Yi Yao
article en

Abstract

Burn shock is a major early complication in the treatment of severely burned patients, and precise and timely fluid management is essential for survival. Traditional clinical indicators such as urine output, blood pressure, central venous pressure (CVP), and blood lactate are commonly used, but each has significant limitations. Invasive hemodynamic monitoring technologies, such as Pulmonary Artery Catheterization (PAC) and Pulse Contour Cardiac Output (PiCCO), have improved the accuracy of fluid assessment, but carry risks of infection and procedural complications and require experienced clinical interpretation within the context of the patient's overall condition. Non-invasive ultrasound-based methods, including critical care ultrasonography and the Venous Excess Ultrasound Score (VExUS), are emerging as promising alternatives, particularly in resource-limited settings. This review summarizes current methods for fluid management in severely burned patients, with a focus on the concepts of fluid responsiveness and fluid tolerance, and provides recommendations for clinical practice.

Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing
Chinese PLA General Hospital (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Ultrasound in Clinical Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.