Administrative Boundaries and Legal Control over Integrity Commission Decisions in Iraq

General Background: After 2003, Iraq witnessed a major transformation in its administrative and legal systems, marked by the establishment of independent bodies to fight corruption, most notably the Federal Integrity Commission. Specific Background: Despite extensive legislative reforms, persistent ambiguity remains regarding the boundaries between administrative authority and the Commission’s jurisdiction, raising questions about the implementation and legitimacy of integrity decisions within the framework of Iraqi law. Knowledge Gap: Previous studies have not comprehensively analyzed the legal limits of administrative power vis-à-vis the Integrity Commission’s decisions or the judicial interpretations that define these boundaries. Aims: This study aims to examine the extent of administrative compliance with the Integrity Commission’s decisions, clarify the constitutional and legislative foundations governing their relationship, and analyze judicial oversight in this context. Results: The research reveals that while the Integrity Commission possesses significant investigative authority, the administration retains limited discretion under strict judicial and legal constraints to ensure the rule of law. Novelty: By integrating legislative analysis with constitutional jurisprudence, the study offers a nuanced framework explaining how executive power interacts with independent anti-corruption mechanisms. Implications: The findings underscore the necessity for clearer constitutional delineation and stronger judicial safeguards to preserve institutional integrity and ensure balanced governance in Iraq. Highlights: Defines clear legal boundaries between administrative powers and the Integrity Commission’s authority. Highlights the judiciary’s central role in ensuring balance and legality in anti-corruption actions. Emphasizes the need for constitutional clarity and stronger institutional independence. Keywords: Integrity Commission, Administrative Authority, Iraqi Legislation, Judicial Oversight, Anti-Corruption

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Indonesian Journal of Law and Economics Review
Published
2025-10-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21070/ijler.v20i4.1329
Primary Topic
Middle East and Rwanda Conflicts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Administrative Boundaries and Legal Control over Integrity Commission Decisions in Iraq

Noor Ali Kazim
Indonesian Journal of Law and Economics Review
Middle East and Rwanda Conflicts
article

Administrative Boundaries and Legal Control over Integrity Commission Decisions in Iraq

Noor Ali Kazim
article en

Abstract

General Background: After 2003, Iraq witnessed a major transformation in its administrative and legal systems, marked by the establishment of independent bodies to fight corruption, most notably the Federal Integrity Commission. Specific Background: Despite extensive legislative reforms, persistent ambiguity remains regarding the boundaries between administrative authority and the Commission’s jurisdiction, raising questions about the implementation and legitimacy of integrity decisions within the framework of Iraqi law. Knowledge Gap: Previous studies have not comprehensively analyzed the legal limits of administrative power vis-à-vis the Integrity Commission’s decisions or the judicial interpretations that define these boundaries. Aims: This study aims to examine the extent of administrative compliance with the Integrity Commission’s decisions, clarify the constitutional and legislative foundations governing their relationship, and analyze judicial oversight in this context. Results: The research reveals that while the Integrity Commission possesses significant investigative authority, the administration retains limited discretion under strict judicial and legal constraints to ensure the rule of law. Novelty: By integrating legislative analysis with constitutional jurisprudence, the study offers a nuanced framework explaining how executive power interacts with independent anti-corruption mechanisms. Implications: The findings underscore the necessity for clearer constitutional delineation and stronger judicial safeguards to preserve institutional integrity and ensure balanced governance in Iraq. Highlights: Defines clear legal boundaries between administrative powers and the Integrity Commission’s authority. Highlights the judiciary’s central role in ensuring balance and legality in anti-corruption actions. Emphasizes the need for constitutional clarity and stronger institutional independence. Keywords: Integrity Commission, Administrative Authority, Iraqi Legislation, Judicial Oversight, Anti-Corruption

Indonesian Journal of Law and Economics ReviewVol. 20(4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Middle East and Rwanda Conflicts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.