Diversity, equity and inclusion at a crossroads: a scoping review of the characteristics of its workplace backlash

Research has shown the positive impacts of diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programmes for individuals and organisations. However, there is growing resistance to DEI in the workplace. We conduct a scoping review at the intersection of the three DEI dimensions guided by three research questions: If a multi-level lens is applied, at which level (macro, meso, or micro) is there currently evidence for a backlash against DEI? Is there evidence for a research-practice gap in this literature, and to what extent are the proposed DEI models concerning the workplace empirically tested? What evidence exists for the interplay between (i) backlash as Intentional resistance or rejection and (ii) backfire as unintended negative consequences of DEI initiatives? Overall, the meso focus dominates existing articles, but more mixed-level future research may be beneficial. Furthermore, the results suggest that while there is a tendency to bridge theory and practice, a non-negligible share of the relevant contributions has a theory-oriented focus or does not aim to complement itself with practice-related empirical applications. This fact underscores the need for more empirical studies to validate DEI initiative models in practical workplace contexts. Finally, the reviewed contributions suggest that organisations wishing to minimise any negative effects of their DEI initiatives must undertake considerable, genuine, and thoughtful work.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Sustainable Business
Published
2025-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40991-025-00122-5
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Gender Diversity and Inequality
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.73
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Diversity, equity and inclusion at a crossroads: a scoping review of the characteristics of its workplace backlash

Iva Mihaylova, Konrad Rietmann
2 citations
Journal of Sustainable Business
Gender Diversity and Inequality
7.73
article

Diversity, equity and inclusion at a crossroads: a scoping review of the characteristics of its workplace backlash

Iva Mihaylova, Konrad Rietmann
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Research has shown the positive impacts of diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programmes for individuals and organisations. However, there is growing resistance to DEI in the workplace. We conduct a scoping review at the intersection of the three DEI dimensions guided by three research questions: If a multi-level lens is applied, at which level (macro, meso, or micro) is there currently evidence for a backlash against DEI? Is there evidence for a research-practice gap in this literature, and to what extent are the proposed DEI models concerning the workplace empirically tested? What evidence exists for the interplay between (i) backlash as Intentional resistance or rejection and (ii) backfire as unintended negative consequences of DEI initiatives? Overall, the meso focus dominates existing articles, but more mixed-level future research may be beneficial. Furthermore, the results suggest that while there is a tendency to bridge theory and practice, a non-negligible share of the relevant contributions has a theory-oriented focus or does not aim to complement itself with practice-related empirical applications. This fact underscores the need for more empirical studies to validate DEI initiative models in practical workplace contexts. Finally, the reviewed contributions suggest that organisations wishing to minimise any negative effects of their DEI initiatives must undertake considerable, genuine, and thoughtful work.

Journal of Sustainable BusinessVol. 10(1)
ZHAW Zurich University of Applied Sciences (CH), University of St.Gallen (CH), University of Applied Sciences St. Gallen (CH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Gender Diversity and Inequality
7.73
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.