The Influence of Prenatal Language Exposure on the Use of Pitch in Newborns’ Vocalisations: A Systematic Review

Prenatal language exposure has been shown to influence early speech perception, with evidence suggesting that the acquisition of certain aspects of native-language prosody may begin before birth. While this notion has been well-supported from a perceptual perspective, findings across available production studies are inconsistent. This study, therefore, explored whether the pitch of newborns’ early vocalisations is influenced by prenatal exposure to their native language via a systematic review of quantitative evidence. The review included 18 studies analysing the pitch patterns of cry and non-cry vocalisations in healthy newborns aged birth to 3 months with monolingual prenatal exposure to 11 languages. It systematically describes the study characteristics and outcomes of these studies and synthesises the converging and diverging trends across them through cross-linguistic comparisons. Within this sample, the available evidence for cross-linguistic differences in the pitch patterns of early vocalisations is sparse and inconsistent. Importantly, substantial variations in the analysis methods used across studies were noted, which further obscure cross-studycomparisons. Furthermore, studies were restricted in number as well as the diversity of languages and vocalisation types represented. Taken together, our review suggests that there is at best tentative evidence for an influence of prenatal language exposure on newborns’ pitch production. Based on this review, we offer recommendations to improve the replicability and representativeness of future research, with the aim of arriving at a more definitive answer to the research question.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
First Language
Published
2025-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/01427237251372203
Primary Topic
Infant Health and Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Influence of Prenatal Language Exposure on the Use of Pitch in Newborns’ Vocalisations: A Systematic Review

Elanie A. van Schalkwyk, Aoju Chen, Caroline Junge
First Language
Infant Health and Development
article

The Influence of Prenatal Language Exposure on the Use of Pitch in Newborns’ Vocalisations: A Systematic Review

Elanie A. van Schalkwyk, Aoju Chen, Caroline Junge
article en

Abstract

Prenatal language exposure has been shown to influence early speech perception, with evidence suggesting that the acquisition of certain aspects of native-language prosody may begin before birth. While this notion has been well-supported from a perceptual perspective, findings across available production studies are inconsistent. This study, therefore, explored whether the pitch of newborns’ early vocalisations is influenced by prenatal exposure to their native language via a systematic review of quantitative evidence. The review included 18 studies analysing the pitch patterns of cry and non-cry vocalisations in healthy newborns aged birth to 3 months with monolingual prenatal exposure to 11 languages. It systematically describes the study characteristics and outcomes of these studies and synthesises the converging and diverging trends across them through cross-linguistic comparisons. Within this sample, the available evidence for cross-linguistic differences in the pitch patterns of early vocalisations is sparse and inconsistent. Importantly, substantial variations in the analysis methods used across studies were noted, which further obscure cross-studycomparisons. Furthermore, studies were restricted in number as well as the diversity of languages and vocalisation types represented. Taken together, our review suggests that there is at best tentative evidence for an influence of prenatal language exposure on newborns’ pitch production. Based on this review, we offer recommendations to improve the replicability and representativeness of future research, with the aim of arriving at a more definitive answer to the research question.

First LanguageVol. 46(2)
University of Applied Sciences Utrecht (NL), Utrecht University (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Infant Health and Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.