A Model for Equipment Replacement Decisions in a Manufacturing System

Poor decisions regarding equipment replacement can often result in costs that exceed the savings and reductions achieved in other areas of production and planning. The primary objective of this study is to present a method that minimizes the risks associated with making decisions about changing machines and establishes a rational basis for reaching optimal decisions. This study proposes an experimental design method integrated with a Net Present Value (NPV) analysis, which can help avoid the economic risks associated with machine replacement decisions. As equipment ages, the failure rate and corresponding maintenance costs increase significantly due to wear-related deterioration and component aging. Due to the nature of the investment, machine replacement decisions are a long-term process and are, therefore, subject to economic risks. Thus, it is believed that this model can greatly contribute to the development of an efficient and competitive production system. We propose a new risk-avoidance NPV analysis model using the Design of Experiments (DoEs) methodology. In our case study result, the minimum NPVs are 2,359,148 EUR (factor [Formula: see text] (cost increasing rate) [Formula: see text] 70%, factor [Formula: see text] (equity utilization rate) [Formula: see text] 35%, factor [Formula: see text] (cost of equity ratio) [Formula: see text] 40%) and 2,462,375 EUR ([Formula: see text] 70%, [Formula: see text] 50%, [Formula: see text] 30%), respectively. On the other hand, the maximum NPV is 3,664,505 EUR ([Formula: see text] 50%, [Formula: see text] 20%, [Formula: see text] 20%). We can say that if the cost of equity ratio increases from 30% to 40%, the decision-maker could make an investment (replacement) decision for the considered case study because the NPV value decreases mainly due to the impact of the cost of equity ratio. Although DoE was well established in the literature, we will adapt this method to the machine tool replacement model with the goal of minimizing financial risk.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Systems
Published
2025-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1142/s021968672750020x
Primary Topic
Management and Optimization Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Model for Equipment Replacement Decisions in a Manufacturing System

Yusuf Tansel İç, Handini Novita Sari
Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Systems
Management and Optimization Techniques
article

A Model for Equipment Replacement Decisions in a Manufacturing System

Yusuf Tansel İç, Handini Novita Sari
article en

Abstract

Poor decisions regarding equipment replacement can often result in costs that exceed the savings and reductions achieved in other areas of production and planning. The primary objective of this study is to present a method that minimizes the risks associated with making decisions about changing machines and establishes a rational basis for reaching optimal decisions. This study proposes an experimental design method integrated with a Net Present Value (NPV) analysis, which can help avoid the economic risks associated with machine replacement decisions. As equipment ages, the failure rate and corresponding maintenance costs increase significantly due to wear-related deterioration and component aging. Due to the nature of the investment, machine replacement decisions are a long-term process and are, therefore, subject to economic risks. Thus, it is believed that this model can greatly contribute to the development of an efficient and competitive production system. We propose a new risk-avoidance NPV analysis model using the Design of Experiments (DoEs) methodology. In our case study result, the minimum NPVs are 2,359,148 EUR (factor [Formula: see text] (cost increasing rate) [Formula: see text] 70%, factor [Formula: see text] (equity utilization rate) [Formula: see text] 35%, factor [Formula: see text] (cost of equity ratio) [Formula: see text] 40%) and 2,462,375 EUR ([Formula: see text] 70%, [Formula: see text] 50%, [Formula: see text] 30%), respectively. On the other hand, the maximum NPV is 3,664,505 EUR ([Formula: see text] 50%, [Formula: see text] 20%, [Formula: see text] 20%). We can say that if the cost of equity ratio increases from 30% to 40%, the decision-maker could make an investment (replacement) decision for the considered case study because the NPV value decreases mainly due to the impact of the cost of equity ratio. Although DoE was well established in the literature, we will adapt this method to the machine tool replacement model with the goal of minimizing financial risk.

Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Systems
Başkent University (TR), Ankara Spine Center (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Management and Optimization Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.