Improving Landslide Susceptibility Assessment Through Non-Landslide Sampling Strategies

Landslides are a prevalent geological hazard in China, posing significant threats to life and property. Landslide susceptibility assessment is essential for disaster prevention, and the quality of non-landslide samples critically affects model accuracy. This study takes Yongxin County, Jiangxi Province, as a case, selecting ten susceptibility factors and applying the Random Forest (RF) model with six non-landslide sampling methods for comparison. Results indicate that non-landslide sample selection substantially influences model performance, with the RF model using the IV method achieving the highest accuracy (AUC = 0.9878). SHAP analysis identifies NDVI, slope, lithology, land cover, and elevation as the primary contributing factors. Statistical results show that RF_IV non-landslide sample predictions are lowest, mainly below 0.18, with a median of 0.18, confirming that the IV method effectively excludes landslide-prone areas and accurately represents non-landslide regions. These findings provide practical guidance for landslide risk managers, local authorities, and policymakers, and offer methodological insights for researchers in geological hazard modeling.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Land
Published
2025-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/land14102059
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Landslides and related hazards
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.42

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Improving Landslide Susceptibility Assessment Through Non-Landslide Sampling Strategies

Wang Luo, Liping Tu, Meiqiu Chen, Y Mao et al.
1 citations
Land
Landslides and related hazards
2.42
article

Improving Landslide Susceptibility Assessment Through Non-Landslide Sampling Strategies

Wang Luo, Liping Tu, Meiqiu Chen, Y Mao, Shengwei Liu, Mei’e Liu, Peng Leng
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Landslides are a prevalent geological hazard in China, posing significant threats to life and property. Landslide susceptibility assessment is essential for disaster prevention, and the quality of non-landslide samples critically affects model accuracy. This study takes Yongxin County, Jiangxi Province, as a case, selecting ten susceptibility factors and applying the Random Forest (RF) model with six non-landslide sampling methods for comparison. Results indicate that non-landslide sample selection substantially influences model performance, with the RF model using the IV method achieving the highest accuracy (AUC = 0.9878). SHAP analysis identifies NDVI, slope, lithology, land cover, and elevation as the primary contributing factors. Statistical results show that RF_IV non-landslide sample predictions are lowest, mainly below 0.18, with a median of 0.18, confirming that the IV method effectively excludes landslide-prone areas and accurately represents non-landslide regions. These findings provide practical guidance for landslide risk managers, local authorities, and policymakers, and offer methodological insights for researchers in geological hazard modeling.

LandVol. 14(10)
Jiangsu Provincial Institute of Geological Survey (CN), Nanjing Surveying and Mapping Research Institute (China) (CN), Jiangxi Agricultural University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Landslides and related hazards
2.42
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.