The First-Person Subjective Pronoun Use Across Genders in L2 Argumentative Essays

Studies of English language learners have paid limited attention to the intersection between gender and authorial presence. This study examined how first-person subject pronouns function as markers of authorial presence in the argumentative writing of Korean EFL students, with particular attention to gender-based patterns. A total of 40 university students (20 male, 20 female) were asked to write argumentative essays in English. While the argumentative genre may have neutralized many gender-related differences, one statistically significant finding emerged: female learners used we more frequently than males in experience-providing sentences. Closer analysis revealed that female students tended to use we to express emotional connection, relational engagement, and shared experience, while male students used it in more instrumental and task-oriented ways. These patterns suggest that gendered discourse practices persist even in constrained academic genres, and can be interpreted through Ivanič’s (1998) concept of the autobiographical self. The findings highlight how gendered identity informs the enactment of authorial stance in L2 academic writing.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Korean Journal of Applied Linguistics
Published
2025-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17154/kjal.2025.09.41.3.107
Primary Topic
Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The First-Person Subjective Pronoun Use Across Genders in L2 Argumentative Essays

Sarah Park, Robert Quick
Korean Journal of Applied Linguistics
Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
article

The First-Person Subjective Pronoun Use Across Genders in L2 Argumentative Essays

Sarah Park, Robert Quick
article en

Abstract

Studies of English language learners have paid limited attention to the intersection between gender and authorial presence. This study examined how first-person subject pronouns function as markers of authorial presence in the argumentative writing of Korean EFL students, with particular attention to gender-based patterns. A total of 40 university students (20 male, 20 female) were asked to write argumentative essays in English. While the argumentative genre may have neutralized many gender-related differences, one statistically significant finding emerged: female learners used we more frequently than males in experience-providing sentences. Closer analysis revealed that female students tended to use we to express emotional connection, relational engagement, and shared experience, while male students used it in more instrumental and task-oriented ways. These patterns suggest that gendered discourse practices persist even in constrained academic genres, and can be interpreted through Ivanič’s (1998) concept of the autobiographical self. The findings highlight how gendered identity informs the enactment of authorial stance in L2 academic writing.

Korean Journal of Applied LinguisticsVol. 41(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.