A Longitudinal Randomized Control Study of Companion Chatbot Use: Anthropomorphism and Its Mediating Role on Social Impacts

Relationships with social artificial intelligence (AI) agents are on the rise. Most notably, people are forming relationships with companion chatbots such as Replika, a type of social AI agent that people can converse with via text or voice chat. These Large Language Model (LLM) chatbots are designed for companionship, and people have reported forming friendships, mentorships, and romantic partnerships with them. Concerns that companion chatbots may harm or replace real human relationships have been raised, but whether and how these social consequences occur remains unclear. Prior research suggests that people’s state of social need and their anthropomorphism of AI may play a role in how human-AI interaction impacts human-human interaction. In this longitudinal study (N = 183), participants were randomly assigned to a chatbot condition (text chat with a companion chatbot) or to a control condition (engage in text-based word games) in which they engaged in their daily task at least 10 minutes a day for 21 consecutive days. Participants completed four surveys during the 21 days, and engaged in audio recorded interviews on day 1 and 21. We investigated three primary questions. First, do daily interactions with a companion chatbot impact people’s social health and human relationships? Second, do people’s social states such the desire for social connection or loneliness predict anthropomorphism of the chatbot? Third, does anthropomorphism of the chatbot predict human-human social impacts? We found that people’s social health and relationships were not significantly impacted by companion chatbot interactions across 21 days of use. However, people who had a higher desire for social connection, but not higher loneliness, anthropomorphized the chatbot more. Those who anthropomorphized the chatbot more indicated that the human-chatbot interaction had greater impacts on their social interactions and relationships with family and friends. Via a mediation analysis, our results suggest that the impact of human-AI interaction on human-human social outcomes is mediated by the extent to which people anthropomorphize the AI agent, which may be motivated by a desire for social connection.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI Ethics and Society
Published
2025-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1609/aies.v8i2.36618
Primary Topic
AI in Service Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Longitudinal Randomized Control Study of Companion Chatbot Use: Anthropomorphism and Its Mediating Role on Social Impacts

Rose E. Guingrich, Michael S. A. Graziano
Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI Ethics and Society
AI in Service Interactions
article

A Longitudinal Randomized Control Study of Companion Chatbot Use: Anthropomorphism and Its Mediating Role on Social Impacts

Rose E. Guingrich, Michael S. A. Graziano
article en

Abstract

Relationships with social artificial intelligence (AI) agents are on the rise. Most notably, people are forming relationships with companion chatbots such as Replika, a type of social AI agent that people can converse with via text or voice chat. These Large Language Model (LLM) chatbots are designed for companionship, and people have reported forming friendships, mentorships, and romantic partnerships with them. Concerns that companion chatbots may harm or replace real human relationships have been raised, but whether and how these social consequences occur remains unclear. Prior research suggests that people’s state of social need and their anthropomorphism of AI may play a role in how human-AI interaction impacts human-human interaction. In this longitudinal study (N = 183), participants were randomly assigned to a chatbot condition (text chat with a companion chatbot) or to a control condition (engage in text-based word games) in which they engaged in their daily task at least 10 minutes a day for 21 consecutive days. Participants completed four surveys during the 21 days, and engaged in audio recorded interviews on day 1 and 21. We investigated three primary questions. First, do daily interactions with a companion chatbot impact people’s social health and human relationships? Second, do people’s social states such the desire for social connection or loneliness predict anthropomorphism of the chatbot? Third, does anthropomorphism of the chatbot predict human-human social impacts? We found that people’s social health and relationships were not significantly impacted by companion chatbot interactions across 21 days of use. However, people who had a higher desire for social connection, but not higher loneliness, anthropomorphized the chatbot more. Those who anthropomorphized the chatbot more indicated that the human-chatbot interaction had greater impacts on their social interactions and relationships with family and friends. Via a mediation analysis, our results suggest that the impact of human-AI interaction on human-human social outcomes is mediated by the extent to which people anthropomorphize the AI agent, which may be motivated by a desire for social connection.

Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI Ethics and SocietyVol. 8(2)
Princeton University (US), Princeton Public Schools (US)
National Science Foundation, Princeton University
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
AI in Service Interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.