Resistance to Change as a Diagnostic Insight: An Interdisciplinary Examination of Stakeholder Opposition to AI in Primary Care

As artificial intelligence (AI) systems become more integrated into healthcare, understanding the roots of resistance is essential, particularly in complex, value-driven settings like primary care. This interdisciplinary study explores stakeholder resistance to AI through interviews with global experts in organizational transformation and resistance to change (RtC). It identifies three interconnected forms of resistance—logical, sociological, and psychological—each linked to specific concerns around ethics, professional identity, and systemic fit. Unlike prior work, this study centers RtC experts’ insights on AI resistance in primary care, a setting often excluded from co-design. Using a qualitative abductive approach, the research highlights resistance as a form of critical feedback and a mechanism for building trust. These findings inform more inclusive, reflexive, and context-sensitive strategies for embedding AI ethically within health systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI Ethics and Society
Published
2025-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1609/aies.v8i3.36796
Primary Topic
Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Resistance to Change as a Diagnostic Insight: An Interdisciplinary Examination of Stakeholder Opposition to AI in Primary Care

Teresa Sides
Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI Ethics and Society
Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management
article

Resistance to Change as a Diagnostic Insight: An Interdisciplinary Examination of Stakeholder Opposition to AI in Primary Care

Teresa Sides
article en

Abstract

As artificial intelligence (AI) systems become more integrated into healthcare, understanding the roots of resistance is essential, particularly in complex, value-driven settings like primary care. This interdisciplinary study explores stakeholder resistance to AI through interviews with global experts in organizational transformation and resistance to change (RtC). It identifies three interconnected forms of resistance—logical, sociological, and psychological—each linked to specific concerns around ethics, professional identity, and systemic fit. Unlike prior work, this study centers RtC experts’ insights on AI resistance in primary care, a setting often excluded from co-design. Using a qualitative abductive approach, the research highlights resistance as a form of critical feedback and a mechanism for building trust. These findings inform more inclusive, reflexive, and context-sensitive strategies for embedding AI ethically within health systems.

Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI Ethics and SocietyVol. 8(3)
The Open University (GB)
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.