Worthy-of-Trust: A Feminist-Queer Ethic of Trustworthiness

In qualitative research, trustworthiness regularly centers external-to-the-research-process approval, grounded in concepts like triangulation. Drawing on feminist-queer theories and ethics, we attempt to “right” how researchers approach trustworthiness, proposing an intra-active shift from “trustworthiness” to being “worthy-of-trust,” from seeking readers’/reviewers’ trust to fostering trust with participants. We queer normative conventions of trustworthiness through an inquiry of practice emphasizing researchers be(com)ing worthy-of-trust with/from participants. With examples from our research, we emphasize worthy-of-trust practices as entangled and entangling with researchers, institutions, participants, and even technologies, while disrupting transactional enactments of trustworthiness, tied to “validity,” and insist on worthy-of-trust as perpetually negotiated and relational.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Qualitative Inquiry
Published
2025-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10778004251383512
Primary Topic
Political Philosophy and Ethics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Worthy-of-Trust: A Feminist-Queer Ethic of Trustworthiness

Stephanie Anne Shelton, Kelly W. Guyotte
Qualitative Inquiry
Political Philosophy and Ethics
article

Worthy-of-Trust: A Feminist-Queer Ethic of Trustworthiness

Stephanie Anne Shelton, Kelly W. Guyotte
article en

Abstract

In qualitative research, trustworthiness regularly centers external-to-the-research-process approval, grounded in concepts like triangulation. Drawing on feminist-queer theories and ethics, we attempt to “right” how researchers approach trustworthiness, proposing an intra-active shift from “trustworthiness” to being “worthy-of-trust,” from seeking readers’/reviewers’ trust to fostering trust with participants. We queer normative conventions of trustworthiness through an inquiry of practice emphasizing researchers be(com)ing worthy-of-trust with/from participants. With examples from our research, we emphasize worthy-of-trust practices as entangled and entangling with researchers, institutions, participants, and even technologies, while disrupting transactional enactments of trustworthiness, tied to “validity,” and insist on worthy-of-trust as perpetually negotiated and relational.

Qualitative Inquiry
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US), University of Alabama (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Political Philosophy and Ethics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.