Deep Learning for Facial Forgery Detection Performance Evaluation of DenseNet201, InceptionV3 and ConvNeXt

The recent spread of AI-generated face forgery is one of the greatest threats to visual media credibility. The Proposed work compares three deep transfer learning models DenseNet201, InceptionV3, and ConvNeXt, in detecting manipulated facial images. An 8,000 real and fake facial image dataset was used to train and benchmark models under consistent experimental condition. ConvNeXt achieved the best classification accuracy of 91.25 % which is much higher than that of DenseNet201 (75.12 %) and InceptionV3 (68.38 %). In addition, ConvNeXt had better trade-off between true positive and false positive rates, which means better generalization and resistance to overfitting. These findings prove the applicability of ConvNeXt in the robust detection of facial forgery and highlight potential application in the practical implementation of the facial authenticity determination. Future research will investigate ensemble methods and real-time inference.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Machine and Computing
Published
2025-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.53759/7669/jmc202606005
Primary Topic
Digital Media Forensic Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Deep Learning for Facial Forgery Detection Performance Evaluation of DenseNet201, InceptionV3 and ConvNeXt

S B Ashoka, G C Akshatha, Muniyegowda Kempanna, Job Prasanth Kumar Chinta Kunta
Journal of Machine and Computing
Digital Media Forensic Detection
article

Deep Learning for Facial Forgery Detection Performance Evaluation of DenseNet201, InceptionV3 and ConvNeXt

S B Ashoka, G C Akshatha, Muniyegowda Kempanna, Job Prasanth Kumar Chinta Kunta
article en

Abstract

The recent spread of AI-generated face forgery is one of the greatest threats to visual media credibility. The Proposed work compares three deep transfer learning models DenseNet201, InceptionV3, and ConvNeXt, in detecting manipulated facial images. An 8,000 real and fake facial image dataset was used to train and benchmark models under consistent experimental condition. ConvNeXt achieved the best classification accuracy of 91.25 % which is much higher than that of DenseNet201 (75.12 %) and InceptionV3 (68.38 %). In addition, ConvNeXt had better trade-off between true positive and false positive rates, which means better generalization and resistance to overfitting. These findings prove the applicability of ConvNeXt in the robust detection of facial forgery and highlight potential application in the practical implementation of the facial authenticity determination. Future research will investigate ensemble methods and real-time inference.

Journal of Machine and Computing
Cluster University Srinagar (IN), Automobile Association (United Kingdom) (GB), Visvesvaraya Technological University (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Digital Media Forensic Detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.