A Tale of Two Metaverses: How America, China, and Europe Are Shaping the “New Internet”

The Metaverse, a virtual shared space created by the convergence of physical and virtual reality, is still in its infancy. Yet, China and the EU have already formulated differing visions for the future of the “new internet,” and issued policies meant to advance that future. The US has neither articulated a specific vision nor adopted specific policies for the emergent Metaverse but has designated it as a critical technology and promoted its use in military contexts. Additionally, it has implemented a range of policy measures that support the technology industry in general and has therefore allowed its big tech companies to make large investments in the Metaverse. In this article, I argue that the divergent stances of the three powers have led to two imagined Metaverses and two actual Metaverses taking shape and competing. In terms of visions, China promotes an industrial Metaverse led by its biggest companies that strengthens the Chinese Communist Party, contributes to economic growth, and to China’s geopolitical leadership. In contrast, the EU envisions an open and interoperable Metaverse that respects digital rights and provides opportunities for European companies. Reality contrasts starkly with the European vision, as there is currently a closed, consumer-focused Western version of the Metaverse dominated by American big tech and a closed, industry-focused Chinese version dominated by Chinese big tech. However, since the Metaverse is still emergent and contested, there is room for policymakers to direct it towards a version that serves more than just commercial or geopolitical interests.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Politics and Governance
Published
2025-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.10246
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Social Media and Politics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.86

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Tale of Two Metaverses: How America, China, and Europe Are Shaping the “New Internet”

Nora von Ingersleben‐Seip
1 citations
Politics and Governance
Social Media and Politics
3.86
article

A Tale of Two Metaverses: How America, China, and Europe Are Shaping the “New Internet”

Nora von Ingersleben‐Seip
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The Metaverse, a virtual shared space created by the convergence of physical and virtual reality, is still in its infancy. Yet, China and the EU have already formulated differing visions for the future of the “new internet,” and issued policies meant to advance that future. The US has neither articulated a specific vision nor adopted specific policies for the emergent Metaverse but has designated it as a critical technology and promoted its use in military contexts. Additionally, it has implemented a range of policy measures that support the technology industry in general and has therefore allowed its big tech companies to make large investments in the Metaverse. In this article, I argue that the divergent stances of the three powers have led to two imagined Metaverses and two actual Metaverses taking shape and competing. In terms of visions, China promotes an industrial Metaverse led by its biggest companies that strengthens the Chinese Communist Party, contributes to economic growth, and to China’s geopolitical leadership. In contrast, the EU envisions an open and interoperable Metaverse that respects digital rights and provides opportunities for European companies. Reality contrasts starkly with the European vision, as there is currently a closed, consumer-focused Western version of the Metaverse dominated by American big tech and a closed, industry-focused Chinese version dominated by Chinese big tech. However, since the Metaverse is still emergent and contested, there is room for policymakers to direct it towards a version that serves more than just commercial or geopolitical interests.

Politics and GovernanceVol. 13
University of Amsterdam (NL)
Universiteit van Amsterdam, Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Social Media and Politics
3.86
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.