Methodological Considerations for Centering Workers’ Epistemic Authority in AI Research

The global AI industry is fueled by hidden and precarized labor, yet worker voices remain largely absent from the research that studies them. This paper introduces Workers' Inquiry as a Research Methodology or WIRM, a participatory methodology designed to shift AI research away from extractive practices and toward co-production with workers. Grounded in Marxist Workers’ Inquiry, WIRM centers workers as community researchers who shape the design, interpretation, and framing of research. We describe how WIRM was developed and implemented in the Data Workers' Inquiry (DWI) project across multiple countries, highlighting how the methodology adapts to diverse contexts of economic, physical, and political precarity. Rather than presenting empirical findings, this paper focuses on the methodology itself: its theoretical roots, structural components, and practical execution. We offer three case illustrations to demonstrate the method’s flexibility and limitations. We conclude by reflecting on key challenges and tensions, and propose WIRM as a replicable framework for worker-led AI research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI Ethics and Society
Published
2025-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1609/aies.v8i2.36667
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Methodological Considerations for Centering Workers’ Epistemic Authority in AI Research

Alex Hanna, C. Wagner, Katherine Peil Kauffman, Milagros Miceli et al.
Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI Ethics and Society
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Methodological Considerations for Centering Workers’ Epistemic Authority in AI Research

Alex Hanna, C. Wagner, Katherine Peil Kauffman, Milagros Miceli, Timnit Gebru, Laurenz Sachenbacher, Adio-Adet Dinika
article en

Abstract

The global AI industry is fueled by hidden and precarized labor, yet worker voices remain largely absent from the research that studies them. This paper introduces Workers' Inquiry as a Research Methodology or WIRM, a participatory methodology designed to shift AI research away from extractive practices and toward co-production with workers. Grounded in Marxist Workers’ Inquiry, WIRM centers workers as community researchers who shape the design, interpretation, and framing of research. We describe how WIRM was developed and implemented in the Data Workers' Inquiry (DWI) project across multiple countries, highlighting how the methodology adapts to diverse contexts of economic, physical, and political precarity. Rather than presenting empirical findings, this paper focuses on the methodology itself: its theoretical roots, structural components, and practical execution. We offer three case illustrations to demonstrate the method’s flexibility and limitations. We conclude by reflecting on key challenges and tensions, and propose WIRM as a replicable framework for worker-led AI research.

Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI Ethics and SocietyVol. 8(2)
Weizenbaum Institute (DE), Distributed Infinity (United States) (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.