Assessment of the Accuracy and Clinical Impact of the Preoperative Histopathology of Resected Early Gastric Cancers

Background/Objectives: Superficial gastric neoplasms, including dysplasia and early adenocarcinoma, are increasingly managed by endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). Preoperative assessment relies on endoscopic forceps biopsy (EFB), despite its limited ability to predict final histology. The diagnostic value of repeat biopsy, the influence of the endoscopy setting where biopsies were taken, and the clinical relevance of histologic discrepancies remain incompletely defined. Methods: We conducted a retrospective, single-center study of 270 superficial gastric lesions resected by ESD between 2015 and 2024. Histologic concordance between EFB and ESD was evaluated, including comparisons between initial and repeated biopsies, and between community- and hospital-based settings. Multivariable models identified predictors of histologic discrepancy and assessed the impact of underestimation on curative resection. The association between biopsy repetition and submucosal fibrosis was also explored. Results: Histologic concordance between EFB and ESD was 54.1%, with underestimation in 41.1% and severe underestimation in 8.9%. Repeat biopsy improved concordance from 39.3% to 60.7% (p = 0.007) and increased adenocarcinoma sensitivity from 12.5% to 56.3%, without increasing submucosal fibrosis. Hospital-based biopsies outperformed community-based ones across all diagnostic metrics. In multivariable analysis, older age and larger lesion size were independent predictors of discrepancy. Histologic underestimation was independently associated with a lower likelihood of curative resection (OR = 0.148; p = 0.003), although only six lesions ultimately exceeded formal ESD criteria due to undetected high-risk features. Conclusions: EFB frequently underestimates histological severity in superficial gastric neoplasia. Repeat biopsy and centralized evaluation significantly improve diagnostic accuracy without increasing procedural risk. However, the role of biopsy lies primarily in excluding high-risk features rather than providing definitive staging. In this context, ESD serves not only as curative therapy but also as a key diagnostic step for accurate staging and treatment planning.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Gastrointestinal Disorders
Published
2025-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/gidisord7040065
Primary Topic
Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessment of the Accuracy and Clinical Impact of the Preoperative Histopathology of Resected Early Gastric Cancers

Ana Ponte, Liliana Santos, Rolando Pinho, Pedro Teixeira et al.
Gastrointestinal Disorders
Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
article

Assessment of the Accuracy and Clinical Impact of the Preoperative Histopathology of Resected Early Gastric Cancers

Ana Ponte, Liliana Santos, Rolando Pinho, Pedro Teixeira, Pedro Mesquita, Rita Ferreira, Carlos M. Costa, João C. Silva, Teresa Freitas
article en

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Superficial gastric neoplasms, including dysplasia and early adenocarcinoma, are increasingly managed by endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). Preoperative assessment relies on endoscopic forceps biopsy (EFB), despite its limited ability to predict final histology. The diagnostic value of repeat biopsy, the influence of the endoscopy setting where biopsies were taken, and the clinical relevance of histologic discrepancies remain incompletely defined. Methods: We conducted a retrospective, single-center study of 270 superficial gastric lesions resected by ESD between 2015 and 2024. Histologic concordance between EFB and ESD was evaluated, including comparisons between initial and repeated biopsies, and between community- and hospital-based settings. Multivariable models identified predictors of histologic discrepancy and assessed the impact of underestimation on curative resection. The association between biopsy repetition and submucosal fibrosis was also explored. Results: Histologic concordance between EFB and ESD was 54.1%, with underestimation in 41.1% and severe underestimation in 8.9%. Repeat biopsy improved concordance from 39.3% to 60.7% (p = 0.007) and increased adenocarcinoma sensitivity from 12.5% to 56.3%, without increasing submucosal fibrosis. Hospital-based biopsies outperformed community-based ones across all diagnostic metrics. In multivariable analysis, older age and larger lesion size were independent predictors of discrepancy. Histologic underestimation was independently associated with a lower likelihood of curative resection (OR = 0.148; p = 0.003), although only six lesions ultimately exceeded formal ESD criteria due to undetected high-risk features. Conclusions: EFB frequently underestimates histological severity in superficial gastric neoplasia. Repeat biopsy and centralized evaluation significantly improve diagnostic accuracy without increasing procedural risk. However, the role of biopsy lies primarily in excluding high-risk features rather than providing definitive staging. In this context, ESD serves not only as curative therapy but also as a key diagnostic step for accurate staging and treatment planning.

Gastrointestinal DisordersVol. 7(4)
Administração Regional de Saúde de Lisboa e Vale do Tejo (PT), Centro Hospitalar de Vila Nova de Gaia (PT), University of Aveiro (PT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.