The Effect of Warm-Up on Muscle Strength and Body Temperature in Athletes with Disabilities

Introduction: Paralympic powerlifting (PP) is a sport in which the bench press is the sole exercise. Warm-up routines are considered essential for optimal performance. Objectives: This study aims to analyze different types of warm-up protocols—traditional warm-up (TW), post-activation performance enhancement (PAPE), and without warm-up (WW)—and their effects on dynamic strength indicators, core temperature, and skin temperature in athletes with disabilities. Methods: Fourteen nationally ranked PP athletes participated in the study. Their performance was evaluated following different warm-up protocols. Dynamic variables analyzed included Maximum Velocity (VMax), Mean Propulsive Velocity (MPV), and Power output. Additionally, tympanic and skin temperatures were measured. Results: No significant differences were observed in dynamic strength indicators across the different warm-up protocols. Thermographic analysis revealed differences only in the triceps muscle between PAPE and TW (p < 0.001), TW and WW (p = 0.004), and PAPE and WW (p = 0.015). Differences were also observed between TW and WW (p = 0.026). Ten minutes post-warm-up, differences were noted between PAPE and WW (p < 0.001) and between TW and WW (p = 0.001). In the WW condition, significant differences were found between pre-warm-up and 10 min post-warm-up (p = 0.031), as well as between post-warm-up and 10 min later (p = 0.003). Conclusions: The study evaluated the potential impact of warm-ups on dynamic indicators of strength, core temperature, and skin temperature. No differences were found between the warm-up methods for strength indicators. Regarding skin temperature, only the triceps showed differences between the PAPE and Traditional methods. Regarding core temperature, after warm-up and 10 min later, the methods without warm-up showed higher temperatures than the PAPE and Traditional methods. Therefore, in practical applications, warm-up methods do not appear to interfere with strength indicators, with lower skin temperatures for the triceps in the PAPE methods.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biomechanics
Published
2025-10-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/biomechanics5040083
Primary Topic
Infrared Thermography in Medicine
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Effect of Warm-Up on Muscle Strength and Body Temperature in Athletes with Disabilities

Ângelo de Almeida Paz, Osvaldo Costa Moreira, Pantelis Τ. Nikolaidis, Felipe J. Aidar et al.
Biomechanics
Infrared Thermography in Medicine
article

The Effect of Warm-Up on Muscle Strength and Body Temperature in Athletes with Disabilities

Ângelo de Almeida Paz, Osvaldo Costa Moreira, Pantelis Τ. Nikolaidis, Felipe J. Aidar, Taísa Pereira Santos, Ragami Chaves Alves, Pablo Santana Prata, Sarah Lisia da Silva Paixão
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Paralympic powerlifting (PP) is a sport in which the bench press is the sole exercise. Warm-up routines are considered essential for optimal performance. Objectives: This study aims to analyze different types of warm-up protocols—traditional warm-up (TW), post-activation performance enhancement (PAPE), and without warm-up (WW)—and their effects on dynamic strength indicators, core temperature, and skin temperature in athletes with disabilities. Methods: Fourteen nationally ranked PP athletes participated in the study. Their performance was evaluated following different warm-up protocols. Dynamic variables analyzed included Maximum Velocity (VMax), Mean Propulsive Velocity (MPV), and Power output. Additionally, tympanic and skin temperatures were measured. Results: No significant differences were observed in dynamic strength indicators across the different warm-up protocols. Thermographic analysis revealed differences only in the triceps muscle between PAPE and TW (p < 0.001), TW and WW (p = 0.004), and PAPE and WW (p = 0.015). Differences were also observed between TW and WW (p = 0.026). Ten minutes post-warm-up, differences were noted between PAPE and WW (p < 0.001) and between TW and WW (p = 0.001). In the WW condition, significant differences were found between pre-warm-up and 10 min post-warm-up (p = 0.031), as well as between post-warm-up and 10 min later (p = 0.003). Conclusions: The study evaluated the potential impact of warm-ups on dynamic indicators of strength, core temperature, and skin temperature. No differences were found between the warm-up methods for strength indicators. Regarding skin temperature, only the triceps showed differences between the PAPE and Traditional methods. Regarding core temperature, after warm-up and 10 min later, the methods without warm-up showed higher temperatures than the PAPE and Traditional methods. Therefore, in practical applications, warm-up methods do not appear to interfere with strength indicators, with lower skin temperatures for the triceps in the PAPE methods.

BiomechanicsVol. 5(4)
Universidade Federal de Viçosa (BR), Universidade Federal de Sergipe (BR), University of West Attica (GR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Infrared Thermography in Medicine
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.