Importance of User Control in Data-Centric Steering for Healthcare Experts

As Artificial Intelligence (AI) becomes increasingly integrated into high-stakes domains like healthcare, effective collaboration between healthcare experts and AI systems is critical. Data-centric steering, which involves fine-tuning prediction models by improving training data quality, plays a key role in this process. However, little research has explored how varying levels of user control affect healthcare experts during data-centric steering. We address this gap by examining manual and automated steering approaches through a between-subjects, mixed-methods user study with 74 healthcare experts. Our findings show that manual steering, which grants direct control over training data, significantly improves model performance while maintaining trust and system understandability. Based on these findings, we propose design implications for a hybrid steering system that combines manual and automated approaches to increase user involvement during human-AI collaboration.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI Ethics and Society
Published
2025-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1609/aies.v8i1.36562
Primary Topic
Big Data and Business Intelligence
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Importance of User Control in Data-Centric Steering for Healthcare Experts

Aditya Bhattacharya, Simone Stumpf, Katrien Verbert
Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI Ethics and Society
Big Data and Business Intelligence
article

Importance of User Control in Data-Centric Steering for Healthcare Experts

Aditya Bhattacharya, Simone Stumpf, Katrien Verbert
article en

Abstract

As Artificial Intelligence (AI) becomes increasingly integrated into high-stakes domains like healthcare, effective collaboration between healthcare experts and AI systems is critical. Data-centric steering, which involves fine-tuning prediction models by improving training data quality, plays a key role in this process. However, little research has explored how varying levels of user control affect healthcare experts during data-centric steering. We address this gap by examining manual and automated steering approaches through a between-subjects, mixed-methods user study with 74 healthcare experts. Our findings show that manual steering, which grants direct control over training data, significantly improves model performance while maintaining trust and system understandability. Based on these findings, we propose design implications for a hybrid steering system that combines manual and automated approaches to increase user involvement during human-AI collaboration.

Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI Ethics and SocietyVol. 8(1)
University of Glasgow (GB), KU Leuven (BE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Big Data and Business Intelligence
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Importance of User Control in Data-Centric Steering for Healthcare Experts — Aditya Bhattacharya, Simone Stumpf, et al. · Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI Ethics and Society (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS