From delegation to defiance: Voter support for party differentiation in coalition governments

Coalition parties often pursue partisan policy to avoid being perceived as overly compromising. Yet, little is known about how voters respond to such partisan differentiation under coalition government. This paper leverages a prominent yet unexpected instance of partisan policymaking in Austria to provide causal evidence on how voters react when a minister acts against their coalition partner. The findings show that while voters appreciate clear partisan signals, the electoral benefits are limited: support increased only among ideologically aligned voters and faded within days. Support for other parties remained unaffected, but declined gradually for the coalition partner of the perpetrating party in the aftermath of the event. Ultimately, the event produced no clear winners. This has direct implications for the trade-offs involved in coalition politics and for our understanding of voter attitudes in parliamentary democracies more broadly.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Party Politics
Published
2025-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/13540688251388917
Primary Topic
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From delegation to defiance: Voter support for party differentiation in coalition governments

Pit Rieger
Party Politics
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
article

From delegation to defiance: Voter support for party differentiation in coalition governments

Pit Rieger
article en

Abstract

Coalition parties often pursue partisan policy to avoid being perceived as overly compromising. Yet, little is known about how voters respond to such partisan differentiation under coalition government. This paper leverages a prominent yet unexpected instance of partisan policymaking in Austria to provide causal evidence on how voters react when a minister acts against their coalition partner. The findings show that while voters appreciate clear partisan signals, the electoral benefits are limited: support increased only among ideologically aligned voters and faded within days. Support for other parties remained unaffected, but declined gradually for the coalition partner of the perpetrating party in the aftermath of the event. Ultimately, the event produced no clear winners. This has direct implications for the trade-offs involved in coalition politics and for our understanding of voter attitudes in parliamentary democracies more broadly.

Party Politics
ETH Zurich (CH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

From delegation to defiance: Voter support for party differentiation in coalition governments — Pit Rieger · Party Politics (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS