Analysis of normative and technical documentation for geotechnical monitoring of landslide processes

This study provides an inductive analysis of current normative and technical documentation for geotechnical monitoring. Based on it, the main disagreements and inaccuracies were identified and measures to eliminate them were proposed. During the study, 26 current normative documents were analyzed through 32 criteria. Initially, it was determined whether these documents were included in the List of National Standards and Codes of Practice, which directly affects the obligation to comply with the document requirements. Documents without concrete requirements to monitoring or with limited range of application were excluded from further analysis. The subsequent analysis was carried out according to criteria such as the timing and cyclicity of work; the location of the source and survey points, and their quantity; the accuracy of determining the position of the points; special instructions when working on landslides, etc. As a result, significant differences have been identified among normative and technical documents governing geotechnical monitoring of landslide processes, specifically in their requirements for the timing and cyclicity of work (they range from 1 day to six months). Furthermore, there is no reliable list of controlled parameters that would be identical for several documents. The following research areas have been identified: developing a system of dependencies of the limit values for controlled parameters; standardizing the optimal number of points depending on the scale of landslide phenomena and topographic conditions of work.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Architecture Construction Transport
Published
2025-10-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31660/2782-232x-2025-3-34-54
Primary Topic
Landslides and related hazards
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analysis of normative and technical documentation for geotechnical monitoring of landslide processes

S. I. Matsiy, Uliana R. Sidaravichute
Architecture Construction Transport
Landslides and related hazards
article

Analysis of normative and technical documentation for geotechnical monitoring of landslide processes

S. I. Matsiy, Uliana R. Sidaravichute
article en

Abstract

This study provides an inductive analysis of current normative and technical documentation for geotechnical monitoring. Based on it, the main disagreements and inaccuracies were identified and measures to eliminate them were proposed. During the study, 26 current normative documents were analyzed through 32 criteria. Initially, it was determined whether these documents were included in the List of National Standards and Codes of Practice, which directly affects the obligation to comply with the document requirements. Documents without concrete requirements to monitoring or with limited range of application were excluded from further analysis. The subsequent analysis was carried out according to criteria such as the timing and cyclicity of work; the location of the source and survey points, and their quantity; the accuracy of determining the position of the points; special instructions when working on landslides, etc. As a result, significant differences have been identified among normative and technical documents governing geotechnical monitoring of landslide processes, specifically in their requirements for the timing and cyclicity of work (they range from 1 day to six months). Furthermore, there is no reliable list of controlled parameters that would be identical for several documents. The following research areas have been identified: developing a system of dependencies of the limit values for controlled parameters; standardizing the optimal number of points depending on the scale of landslide phenomena and topographic conditions of work.

Architecture Construction TransportVol. 5(3)
Kuban State Agrarian University (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Landslides and related hazards
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.