Generalizing or personalizing: effects of three types of second person pronouns in service ads

Second person pronouns have both generalizing and personalizing functions, corresponding to their generic and deictic readings. Netherlandic Dutch distinguishes three types of address pronouns: a weak informal pronoun, a strong informal pronoun, and a formal pronoun. The latter two seem more suitable for personalization thanks to their predominant deictic reading, while the former easily obtains a generic reading and is therefore best suited for generalization. An online experiment tested four hypotheses about the effects of these pronouns in service ads. The results show that hedonic service ads generally receive better evaluations (attitudes, purchase intention) than utilitarian ones. The pronoun type only makes a difference in hedonic service ads, where the highest scores are obtained with the weak informal pronoun and the lowest with the formal pronoun. For ratings on the lower end of the scale, the effect is reversed: the use of a formal pronoun actually improves the scores.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Dutch Journal of Applied Linguistics
Published
2025-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.51751/dujal19032
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Digital Communication and Language
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.94

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Generalizing or personalizing: effects of three types of second person pronouns in service ads

Helen de Hoop, Sebastian Sadowski, Natalia Levshina, Gert-Jan Schoenmakers
1 citations
Dutch Journal of Applied Linguistics
Digital Communication and Language
1.94
article

Generalizing or personalizing: effects of three types of second person pronouns in service ads

Helen de Hoop, Sebastian Sadowski, Natalia Levshina, Gert-Jan Schoenmakers
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Second person pronouns have both generalizing and personalizing functions, corresponding to their generic and deictic readings. Netherlandic Dutch distinguishes three types of address pronouns: a weak informal pronoun, a strong informal pronoun, and a formal pronoun. The latter two seem more suitable for personalization thanks to their predominant deictic reading, while the former easily obtains a generic reading and is therefore best suited for generalization. An online experiment tested four hypotheses about the effects of these pronouns in service ads. The results show that hedonic service ads generally receive better evaluations (attitudes, purchase intention) than utilitarian ones. The pronoun type only makes a difference in hedonic service ads, where the highest scores are obtained with the weak informal pronoun and the lowest with the formal pronoun. For ratings on the lower end of the scale, the effect is reversed: the use of a formal pronoun actually improves the scores.

Dutch Journal of Applied LinguisticsVol. 14
Radboud University Nijmegen (NL), Utrecht University (NL)
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Digital Communication and Language
1.94
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.