Comparative Responsiveness of Preference-Based Health-Related Quality of Life, Social Care, and Well-Being Measures in the Context of Multiple Sclerosis
The ICECAP-A, ASCOT, and MSIS-8D were more responsive than the EQ-5D-3L in the context of MS when compared using standardized scores. The increased responsiveness of EQ-5D-3L when absolute values were used seems an artefact of the wide-ranging scale of this measure. This illustrates how the maximum potential range of values for a given PBM tariff could influence whether an intervention is found to be cost-effective.
Authors
- Rod Middleton (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2130-4420)
- Jeremy Chataway (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7286-6901)
- Nia Morrish (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7206-4957)
- Annie Hawton (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1336-5899)
- Sarah Thomas (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9501-9091)
- Kate Boddy (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9135-5488)
- Amy Heather (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6596-3479)
- Jennifer A. Freeman (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4072-9758)
- Elizabeth Goodwin (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1351-9170)
Institutions
- Queen Mary University of London (GB)
- University of Exeter (GB)
- Swansea University (GB)
- National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery (GB)
- University College London (GB)
- Peninsula College of Medicine and Dentistry (GB)
- University of Plymouth (GB)
- Bournemouth University (GB)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Value in Health
- Published
- 2025-10-15
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2025.09.3063
- Primary Topic
- Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00