Assessing asymmetry risk premium in U.S. stock markets

This study examines the relationship between stock asymmetry and future returns in the U.S. equity market, comparing a new density function-based asymmetry metric with traditional skewness measures. Traditional skewness metrics have yielded unclear characterizations of the relationship between individual stock return asymmetry (RA) and future returns. Moreover, despite existing claims that idiosyncratic asymmetric risk is not priced in U.S. stocks. Using U.S. equity market data, we measured individual stock idiosyncratic asymmetry with both the new density function-based metric and traditional skewness (ISKEW). We formed portfolios based on asymmetry levels and tested differences in future returns across portfolios, while controlling for firm characteristics and incorporating moderating factors. The density function-based asymmetry metric showed a significantly negative correlation with future average returns of U.S. stocks, consistent with recent theoretical deductions. Traditional skewness metrics produced significantly weaker relationships. The return differences across asymmetry-sorted portfolios were economically and statistically significant, even after controlling for firm characteristics and when accounting for moderating factors like volatility, investor sentiment, market liquidity, and arbitrage trading.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Review of Economics & Finance
Published
2025-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2025.104662
Primary Topic
Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing asymmetry risk premium in U.S. stock markets

Yan Chen, Yakun Liu, Lei Zhang
International Review of Economics & Finance
Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
article

Assessing asymmetry risk premium in U.S. stock markets

Yan Chen, Yakun Liu, Lei Zhang
article en

Abstract

This study examines the relationship between stock asymmetry and future returns in the U.S. equity market, comparing a new density function-based asymmetry metric with traditional skewness measures. Traditional skewness metrics have yielded unclear characterizations of the relationship between individual stock return asymmetry (RA) and future returns. Moreover, despite existing claims that idiosyncratic asymmetric risk is not priced in U.S. stocks. Using U.S. equity market data, we measured individual stock idiosyncratic asymmetry with both the new density function-based metric and traditional skewness (ISKEW). We formed portfolios based on asymmetry levels and tested differences in future returns across portfolios, while controlling for firm characteristics and incorporating moderating factors. The density function-based asymmetry metric showed a significantly negative correlation with future average returns of U.S. stocks, consistent with recent theoretical deductions. Traditional skewness metrics produced significantly weaker relationships. The return differences across asymmetry-sorted portfolios were economically and statistically significant, even after controlling for firm characteristics and when accounting for moderating factors like volatility, investor sentiment, market liquidity, and arbitrage trading.

International Review of Economics & FinanceVol. 104
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Assessing asymmetry risk premium in U.S. stock markets — Yan Chen, Yakun Liu, et al. · International Review of Economics & Finance (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS