A real options approach for cost benefits assessment of power generation from underground coal gasification with CCS

Underground gasification combined cycle (UGCC) with carbon capture and storage (CCS) is regarded as a promising method of carbon-neutral coal gasification power generation, capable of effectively reducing greenhouse gas emissions and environmental pollution. However, due to high capital investment and uncertainties, the UGCC-CCS project has not yet been commercially deployed. In view of this, the study adopted the real options approach to perform the investment returns analysis of UGCC-CCS. In this study, several critical uncertain factors such as carbon price, technological process and policy incentives were considered. And the critical carbon for the investment were obtained and the recommendations for future project investments were provided. The results showed that investment returns cannot be obtained for UGCC-CCS power plants when the carbon market is ignored. Once UGCC-CCS power plants are integrated into the carbon market, the critical carbon price for investment is 518.49 CNY/t and 527.93 CNY/t under carbon capture and CCS, respectively, with the optimal investment time being 2032. When the feed-in tariff subsidy is 0.5 CNY/kWh or the research and development subsidy is 3 billion CNY, the optimal timing to invest can be advanced to 2027 and 2028, respectively.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alexandria Engineering Journal
Published
2025-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2025.10.006
Primary Topic
Mining and Gasification Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A real options approach for cost benefits assessment of power generation from underground coal gasification with CCS

Ye Feng, Jinglong Chen
Alexandria Engineering Journal
Mining and Gasification Technologies
article

A real options approach for cost benefits assessment of power generation from underground coal gasification with CCS

Ye Feng, Jinglong Chen
article en

Abstract

Underground gasification combined cycle (UGCC) with carbon capture and storage (CCS) is regarded as a promising method of carbon-neutral coal gasification power generation, capable of effectively reducing greenhouse gas emissions and environmental pollution. However, due to high capital investment and uncertainties, the UGCC-CCS project has not yet been commercially deployed. In view of this, the study adopted the real options approach to perform the investment returns analysis of UGCC-CCS. In this study, several critical uncertain factors such as carbon price, technological process and policy incentives were considered. And the critical carbon for the investment were obtained and the recommendations for future project investments were provided. The results showed that investment returns cannot be obtained for UGCC-CCS power plants when the carbon market is ignored. Once UGCC-CCS power plants are integrated into the carbon market, the critical carbon price for investment is 518.49 CNY/t and 527.93 CNY/t under carbon capture and CCS, respectively, with the optimal investment time being 2032. When the feed-in tariff subsidy is 0.5 CNY/kWh or the research and development subsidy is 3 billion CNY, the optimal timing to invest can be advanced to 2027 and 2028, respectively.

Alexandria Engineering JournalVol. 131
Shanxi University of Finance and Economics (CN), China University of Mining and Technology (CN), Wuhan University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Mining and Gasification Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A real options approach for cost benefits assessment of power generation from underground coal gasification with CCS — Ye Feng, Jinglong Chen · Alexandria Engineering Journal (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS