S2AI revision surgery - biomechanical evaluation of increased screw diameters
Revision surgery with both screws demonstrated noteworthy enhancement in stability. However, the choice between 10.5 mm and 11.5 mm screws for optimal revision stability appears inconsequential. This suggests that factors beyond the screw diameter may play a crucial role in the stability of revision screws.
Authors
- Manuel Kistler (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3602-6785)
- Carl Neuerburg (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1373-093X)
- Boris Michael Holzapfel (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3989-2531)
- Adrian Cavalcanti Kußmaul (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9648-0998)
- Jan Wulf (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0008-5981-905X)
- Wolfgang Böcker (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0554-0201)
- Hannes Traxler (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5228-1906)
- Nele Baur
- Kenny Hagar
Institutions
- LMU Klinikum (DE)
- Medical University of Vienna (AT)
- Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
Publication Details
- Journal
- European Spine Journal
- Published
- 2025-10-15
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-025-09469-6
- Primary Topic
- Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00