Evaluating credibility, legitimacy, and salience in a participatory modeling project in the food, energy, water nexus

Credibility, legitimacy, and salience (CLS) in co-producing knowledge are considered critical properties of successful participatory modeling (PM) projects. We use a large PM project focused on projecting alternative futures in the FEW nexus of the US Midwest to assess whether the scenarios, models, and projections had high perceived CLS. Assessments of CLS in PM projects in the context of FEW nexuses are relatively uncommon. Specifically, we explore two key questions: (1) Were the PM project outputs perceived as credible, legitimate, and salient? and (2) To what extent do perceptions of CLS between researchers and participant stakeholders align? Findings suggest that our PM process had positive impacts on the CLS of these outputs from the perspective of both groups of participants. However, achieving internal CLS was a necessary but not sufficient condition to ensure the CLS of these boundary objects from the point of view of societal actors external to the project. Without accessible and useful translation of results for external audience, the project outputs may be perceived as low on salience. We also found that participant stakeholders rated CLS higher than researchers. Researchers were more self-critical of model limitations, while participant stakeholders focused on the quality of interactions and responsiveness to suggestions. Future assessments of CLS in PM projects should use measures to capture both internal PM processes, internal perceptions of project outputs, and assessment of project outputs from the perspective of external societal stakeholders and decision-makers. • Assessed Credibility, Legitimacy, and Salience (CLS) of Participatory Modeling (PM). • Researchers and participant stakeholders viewed PM process positively for CLS. • Internal CLS was necessary but not sufficient for perceived CLS of boundary objects. • PM outputs may have low salience without usable translation for external audiences. • Assessing CLS should capture PM processes and internal and external perceptions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Science & Policy
Published
2025-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2025.104249
Primary Topic
Water-Energy-Food Nexus Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating credibility, legitimacy, and salience in a participatory modeling project in the food, energy, water nexus

Jeffrey M. Bielicki, Douglas B. Jackson‐Smith, Kaustubh Kumar
Environmental Science & Policy
Water-Energy-Food Nexus Studies
article

Evaluating credibility, legitimacy, and salience in a participatory modeling project in the food, energy, water nexus

Jeffrey M. Bielicki, Douglas B. Jackson‐Smith, Kaustubh Kumar
article en

Abstract

Credibility, legitimacy, and salience (CLS) in co-producing knowledge are considered critical properties of successful participatory modeling (PM) projects. We use a large PM project focused on projecting alternative futures in the FEW nexus of the US Midwest to assess whether the scenarios, models, and projections had high perceived CLS. Assessments of CLS in PM projects in the context of FEW nexuses are relatively uncommon. Specifically, we explore two key questions: (1) Were the PM project outputs perceived as credible, legitimate, and salient? and (2) To what extent do perceptions of CLS between researchers and participant stakeholders align? Findings suggest that our PM process had positive impacts on the CLS of these outputs from the perspective of both groups of participants. However, achieving internal CLS was a necessary but not sufficient condition to ensure the CLS of these boundary objects from the point of view of societal actors external to the project. Without accessible and useful translation of results for external audience, the project outputs may be perceived as low on salience. We also found that participant stakeholders rated CLS higher than researchers. Researchers were more self-critical of model limitations, while participant stakeholders focused on the quality of interactions and responsiveness to suggestions. Future assessments of CLS in PM projects should use measures to capture both internal PM processes, internal perceptions of project outputs, and assessment of project outputs from the perspective of external societal stakeholders and decision-makers. • Assessed Credibility, Legitimacy, and Salience (CLS) of Participatory Modeling (PM). • Researchers and participant stakeholders viewed PM process positively for CLS. • Internal CLS was necessary but not sufficient for perceived CLS of boundary objects. • PM outputs may have low salience without usable translation for external audiences. • Assessing CLS should capture PM processes and internal and external perceptions.

Environmental Science & PolicyVol. 173
The Ohio State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Water-Energy-Food Nexus Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.