The Alternative to Neonicotinoids: Premises for a Sustainable Agricultural Policy in the Romanian Context

The article analyzes the controversies generated by the use of neonicotinoids in Romanian agriculture, in the context of successive derogations issued by the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development, in contradiction with European Union regulations on the protection of pollinators.The study starts from the case of the derogation of December 2024 and follows the legal, ecological and socioeconomic implications of the administrative decisions, balancing the divergent positions of the actors involved: authorities, farmers, beekeepers and environmental organizations.By analyzing official documents and public positions of the authorities, the article highlights the tensions between the objectives of agricultural production and the need to protect biodiversity.The preliminary conclusions emphasize the need for a coherent public policy based on scientific data to facilitate the transition to sustainable agricultural practices, without compromising food security or ecosystem health.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development Studies.
Published
2025-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.35219/jards.2025.3.04
Primary Topic
Insect and Pesticide Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Alternative to Neonicotinoids: Premises for a Sustainable Agricultural Policy in the Romanian Context

Adrian Turek Rahoveanu, Eliza Carmen Despa Mocian
Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development Studies.
Insect and Pesticide Research
article

The Alternative to Neonicotinoids: Premises for a Sustainable Agricultural Policy in the Romanian Context

Adrian Turek Rahoveanu, Eliza Carmen Despa Mocian
article en

Abstract

The article analyzes the controversies generated by the use of neonicotinoids in Romanian agriculture, in the context of successive derogations issued by the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development, in contradiction with European Union regulations on the protection of pollinators.The study starts from the case of the derogation of December 2024 and follows the legal, ecological and socioeconomic implications of the administrative decisions, balancing the divergent positions of the actors involved: authorities, farmers, beekeepers and environmental organizations.By analyzing official documents and public positions of the authorities, the article highlights the tensions between the objectives of agricultural production and the need to protect biodiversity.The preliminary conclusions emphasize the need for a coherent public policy based on scientific data to facilitate the transition to sustainable agricultural practices, without compromising food security or ecosystem health.

Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development Studies.Vol. 2(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Insect and Pesticide Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.