Estimating branch angle distributions from terrestrial laser scanning data using an instance segmentation-based contraction method

• Proposed BASeg, a novel method for automatic extraction of branch angles and branch angle distributions from TLS data. • BASeg addressed the mal-contraction of skeleton-based methods. • BASeg enabled reliable retrieval of branch angle distributions for trees of varying sizes. • Evaluated the sensitivity of BASeg to different TLS scanning protocols. Tree branch angles and their distributions (BADs) are key structural traits influencing light interception, resource allocation, and canopy architecture. However, measuring them accurately remains challenging. We present BASeg, a novel method based on instance segmentation to automatically quantify branch angles and BADs from terrestrial laser scanning (TLS) data. BASeg segments individual branches using Voronoi partitioning, fits branch diameters via non-linear least squares, downsamples branch point clouds of varying diameter to different resolutions, and skeletonizes branches using the Laplacian algorithm. Branch angles are then calculated through a cluster-based nearest neighbor graph. We validated BASeg using leaf-off TLS data from six sycamore trees and using simulated data from nine trees (aspen, birch, and maple), spanning various sizes. Additionally, we evaluated its sensitivity to TLS scanning protocols—scanning angular resolution, scanning distance between different locations, and number of scan positions—using 107 field-measured angles from two large beech trees. BASeg achieved a root mean square error (RMSE) of 9.96° (14.64 %) and a concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) of 0.89 for branch angle estimation. For estimating BADs, BASeg achieved mean absolute error (MAE) ranging from 2.2 to 381.1 (25.2 % to 69.3 %), outperforming TreeQSM, Laplacian, TreeGraph, L1-tree, and WOODSKE. Neither scanning distance (10–20 m) nor the number of scan positions (3–6) affected the accuracy of branch angles or BADs traits, while scanning angular resolution (0.01°–0.04°) did impact these traits. This study offers an effective approach for quantifying BADs and improves the understanding of fine-scale tree architecture within TLS frameworks.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation
Published
2025-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2025.104903
Primary Topic
Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Estimating branch angle distributions from terrestrial laser scanning data using an instance segmentation-based contraction method

Louise Terryn, Kim Calders, Xi Peng, Hans Verbeeck
International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation
Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
article

Estimating branch angle distributions from terrestrial laser scanning data using an instance segmentation-based contraction method

Louise Terryn, Kim Calders, Xi Peng, Hans Verbeeck
article en

Abstract

• Proposed BASeg, a novel method for automatic extraction of branch angles and branch angle distributions from TLS data. • BASeg addressed the mal-contraction of skeleton-based methods. • BASeg enabled reliable retrieval of branch angle distributions for trees of varying sizes. • Evaluated the sensitivity of BASeg to different TLS scanning protocols. Tree branch angles and their distributions (BADs) are key structural traits influencing light interception, resource allocation, and canopy architecture. However, measuring them accurately remains challenging. We present BASeg, a novel method based on instance segmentation to automatically quantify branch angles and BADs from terrestrial laser scanning (TLS) data. BASeg segments individual branches using Voronoi partitioning, fits branch diameters via non-linear least squares, downsamples branch point clouds of varying diameter to different resolutions, and skeletonizes branches using the Laplacian algorithm. Branch angles are then calculated through a cluster-based nearest neighbor graph. We validated BASeg using leaf-off TLS data from six sycamore trees and using simulated data from nine trees (aspen, birch, and maple), spanning various sizes. Additionally, we evaluated its sensitivity to TLS scanning protocols—scanning angular resolution, scanning distance between different locations, and number of scan positions—using 107 field-measured angles from two large beech trees. BASeg achieved a root mean square error (RMSE) of 9.96° (14.64 %) and a concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) of 0.89 for branch angle estimation. For estimating BADs, BASeg achieved mean absolute error (MAE) ranging from 2.2 to 381.1 (25.2 % to 69.3 %), outperforming TreeQSM, Laplacian, TreeGraph, L1-tree, and WOODSKE. Neither scanning distance (10–20 m) nor the number of scan positions (3–6) affected the accuracy of branch angles or BADs traits, while scanning angular resolution (0.01°–0.04°) did impact these traits. This study offers an effective approach for quantifying BADs and improves the understanding of fine-scale tree architecture within TLS frameworks.

International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and GeoinformationVol. 144
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.