Diagnostic accuracy of simple magnetic resonance imaging markers for detection of treatment response compared to complex disease activity scores in patients with active Crohn's disease

BackgroundMagnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scores have been validated for monitoring Crohn's disease (CD) but are not widely used in clinical practice.PurposeTo evaluate treatment response in patients with active CD using simple imaging markers compared to complex multifactorial scores.Material and MethodsThis was a post-hoc analysis of MRI-enterocolonographies performed in a prospective, blinded, multicenter study. Patients with endoscopically active CD completed ileocolonoscopy and MRI with intravenous contrast and diffusion-weighted sequences before and after medical treatment. Response was defined as ≥50% reduction of the Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn's Disease. Changes in bowel wall thickness (BWT) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) were compared to the magnetic resonance index of activity (MaRIA), simplified MaRIA, and Clermont score.ResultsA total of 42 patients entered the analysis, and endoscopic response was achieved in 19 (45.2%). All activity scores improved in patients with endoscopic response compared to non-responders (<i>P</i> <0.05). The relative reduction of BWT for the most severely affected bowel segment (area under the curve [AUC]=0.76, 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.61-0.91) trended towards a higher diagnostic accuracy compared to the global MaRIA score (AUC=0.63, 95% CI=0.45-0.81; <i>P</i> = 0.1). The per-segment response was more accurately evaluated with BWT compared to the segmental MaRIA score (AUC=0.82 and 0.67, respectively; <i>P</i> = 0.05). A 17% decrease in BWT resulted in an optimal sensitivity and specificity of 78.9% (95% CI=54.4-93.9) and 85.2% (95% CI=66.3-95.8), respectively.ConclusionBWT is not inferior to MaRIA when determining treatment response in CD. This measure is simple to perform and does not require intravenous contrast.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Acta Radiologica
Published
2025-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/02841851251383920
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.63
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Diagnostic accuracy of simple magnetic resonance imaging markers for detection of treatment response compared to complex disease activity scores in patients with active Crohn's disease

Torben Knudsen, Michael Dam Jensen, Søren Rafael Rafaelsen, Jacob Broder Brodersen et al.
2 citations
Acta Radiologica
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
3.63
article

Diagnostic accuracy of simple magnetic resonance imaging markers for detection of treatment response compared to complex disease activity scores in patients with active Crohn's disease

Torben Knudsen, Michael Dam Jensen, Søren Rafael Rafaelsen, Jacob Broder Brodersen, Mie Agerbæk Juel, Jens E. Kjeldsen, Emilia Nejatbakhsh
article en
2 citations

Abstract

BackgroundMagnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scores have been validated for monitoring Crohn's disease (CD) but are not widely used in clinical practice.PurposeTo evaluate treatment response in patients with active CD using simple imaging markers compared to complex multifactorial scores.Material and MethodsThis was a post-hoc analysis of MRI-enterocolonographies performed in a prospective, blinded, multicenter study. Patients with endoscopically active CD completed ileocolonoscopy and MRI with intravenous contrast and diffusion-weighted sequences before and after medical treatment. Response was defined as ≥50% reduction of the Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn's Disease. Changes in bowel wall thickness (BWT) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) were compared to the magnetic resonance index of activity (MaRIA), simplified MaRIA, and Clermont score.ResultsA total of 42 patients entered the analysis, and endoscopic response was achieved in 19 (45.2%). All activity scores improved in patients with endoscopic response compared to non-responders (<i>P</i> <0.05). The relative reduction of BWT for the most severely affected bowel segment (area under the curve [AUC]=0.76, 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.61-0.91) trended towards a higher diagnostic accuracy compared to the global MaRIA score (AUC=0.63, 95% CI=0.45-0.81; <i>P</i> = 0.1). The per-segment response was more accurately evaluated with BWT compared to the segmental MaRIA score (AUC=0.82 and 0.67, respectively; <i>P</i> = 0.05). A 17% decrease in BWT resulted in an optimal sensitivity and specificity of 78.9% (95% CI=54.4-93.9) and 85.2% (95% CI=66.3-95.8), respectively.ConclusionBWT is not inferior to MaRIA when determining treatment response in CD. This measure is simple to perform and does not require intravenous contrast.

Acta RadiologicaVol. 67(1)
University of Southern Denmark (DK), Odense University Hospital (DK), Hospital South West Jutland (DK), Lillebaelt Hospital (DK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
3.63
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.